ITA NO.1161/AHD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH, AHMEDABAD [CORAM: PRAMOD KUMAR AM AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY JM] ITA NO.1161/AHD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 QUINTILES DATA PROCESSING CENTRE (INDIA) PVT. LTD., ..................APPELLANT 404/B, B-BLOCK, SHAPATH IV, OPP. KARNAVATI CLUB, SARKHEJ-GANDHINAGAR ROAD, AHMEDABAD 380 051. [PAN : AAACQ 0935 H] VS. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, AHMEDABAD. ............................RESPONDENT APPEARANCES BY SANJAY R. SHAH FOR THE APPELLANT V.K. SINGH FOR THE RESPONDENT HEARING CONCLUDED ON: 08.05.2018 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON : 15.05.2018 O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR, AM: 1. BY WAY OF THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT HA S CHALLENGED CORRECTNESS OF THE ORDER DATED 11.02.2014 PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFI CER IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S. 144C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED OUT FOR HEARING, LEA RNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT AS THE GRIEVANCES OF THE ASSESSEE HA VE BEEN ADJUDICATED UPON IN THE MUTUALLY AGREED PROCEEDINGS (MAP), THE ASSESSEE THU S NOT WISH TO PURSUE IT APPEAL. IN EFFECT THUS, THE APPEAL IS NOT PRESSED. 3. LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DOES NOT OPP OSE THE STAND SO TAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE. ITA NO.1161/AHD/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 PAGE 2 OF 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 15 TH DAY OF MAY, 2018. SD/- SD/- MS. MADHUMITA ROY PRAMOD KUMAR JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMB ER) DATED: 15 TH MAY, 2018. PBN/* COPIES TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDE NT (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCHES, AHMEDABAD