, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , B B ENCH, CHENNAI . . . , . , & BEFORE SHRI N.R.S.GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1166/MDS/2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12) MR. J.KUMAR, M/S. CHANDRA TRADERS, 2/479, GANESH COMPLEX, EB STORE OPP. PERAMBALUR-621 212. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-I(3), TRICHY. PAN:AYCPK6829M ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MR. AJIT KUMAR VARMA, CIT /DATE OF HEARING : 4 TH APRIL, 2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 4 TH APRIL, 2016 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TR ICHY-1, DATED 18.03.2015 IN C. NO.6143(15)/CIT-1/TRY-2013-1 4 PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE ACT. 2. THE LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE AS SESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION DATED 31.03.2016 REQUESTIN G PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE ABOVE APPEAL BECAU SE THE ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN COMPLETED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER UNDER 2 ITA NO.1166 /MDS/2015 SECTION 263 OF THE ACT BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND THE ASSESSEE HAD AGREED WITH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER. 3. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED AU THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 4. HENCE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 4 TH APRIL, 2016 SD/- SD/- ( . . . ) ( . ) (N.R.S.GANESAN) ( A.M OHAN ALANKAMONY ) # % / JUDICIAL MEMBER % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER # /CHENNAI, ( /DATED 4 TH APRIL, 2016 SOMU *+ ,+ /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. + 1 /DR 6. /GF