The Adil Amanat Co-op Credit Society Limited , Bijapur V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 & TPS, , Bijapur

ITA 1170/BANG/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5756 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-07-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 18-07-2024
• Assessment Year: 2017-2018
• Appeal Filed On: 14-06-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NEHA SAHAY
• Assessee Lawyers: VARUN BHAT
• Keywords: Set aside
• Section: 40(a)(ia)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Judicial Member ITA N o. 1170/ Bang/2024: Asst . Year : 2017-2018 The A di l A ma nat Co- op Cre dit Soci et y Li mi te d Al ankar Tal kies Road M. G.Road, Bij apur Kar nataka – 586 101. PAN: AAAAT6687R. vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1 & TPS Bijapur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Sri.Varun Bhat, CA Respondent by: Ms.Neha Sahay, JCIT-DR Date of Hearing : 18.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 19.07.2024 O R D E R Per Prakash Chand Yadav, JM : The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the learned CIT(A) dated 20 th February, 2024 having DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1061193700(1) and relates to assessment year 2017-2018. 2. The facts leading to the present appeal are as under: The assessee is a co-operative society, filed its income-tax return on 30 th October, 2017, declaring an income of Rs.28,68,010. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny inter alia on the grounds that cash deposited during demonetization period. Thereafter, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued questionnaire to the assessee and framed the assessment by observing that the assessee failed to explain the source of cash deposited during the 2 ITA No.1170/Bang/2024 (AY 2017-18) The Adil Amanat Co-op Cr.Society Ltd. 2 demonetization period to the tune of Rs.2,59,66,500. The AO observed that the assessee continue to accept cash in the shape of illegal tenders after 09.11.2016. For the sake of convenience, the observations of the AO are reproduced as under: - “Though it is presumed that all such collected old notes were deposited into its banks after having accounted for in its cash book, since the notes were banned, the demonetized currency cannot be treated as a movable asset as claimed by it of treating the old banned currency with value. Accordingly, in view of the discussions as above, the monetary transactions done by the assessee in the SBN notes after 09.11.2016 are not valid and therefore, the same is to be treated as unexplained cash deposits. The value entered into you books of accounts has to be treated as ZERO against each entry of such old notes taken. Against the value of zero it has got credit in its bank account.” 3. At last, the AO made an addition of Rs.1,97,42,000 u/s.68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” hereinafter) to the returned income of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved with the order of the AO, the assessee filed appeal before the learned CIT(A), who partly allowed the appeal of the assessee and sustained the addition of Rs.1.97 crore on the ground that the assessee has accepted illegal loans after the demonetization event. 5. Assailing the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has come up in appeal before us. The learned AR of the assessee argued that the ld.CIT(A) and the AO has overlooked the Circular issued by RBI dated 14 th November, 2016, which circular has clarified that there is only one restriction on the cooperative banks that they cannot exchange the SBN with new currency. It is the argument of the ld.Counsel for 3 ITA No.1170/Bang/2024 (AY 2017-18) The Adil Amanat Co-op Cr.Society Ltd. 3 the assessee that there was no restriction on the banks for accepting old currency notes of Rs.500 and Rs.1000. 6. The learned Departmental Representative relied upon the orders of the authorities below. 7. After considering the rival submissions and perusing the material on record, we observe that the AO has not examined the purport of CBDT Circular dated 14 th November, 2016. Therefore, we restore the matter to the file of the AO for de novo adjudication. Before parting, we would also give liberty to the assessee to agitate all the issues including the issue of 40(a)(ia) before the AO. Needless to say, the AO will provide proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee in the set aside proceedings. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19 th July, 2024. Sd/- (Chandra Poojari) Sd/- (Prakash Chand Yadav) Accountant Member Judicial Member Bangalore; Dated: 16 th July, 2024 Devadas G* Copy to: 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A) Concerned. 4. The DCIT concerned. Asst.Registrar 5. The Sr. DR, ITAT, Bangalore. ITAT, Bangalore