, , , , B, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, B BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'(, , , , )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.1175 AND 1176/AHD/2011 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2007-2008] MUKESHKUMAR HARILAL SHAH PROP. M/S.BIGDEAL L-602, 7 TH FLOOR, SHILALEKH SHAHIBAUG, AHMEDABAD. PAN : AFNPS 9480 E /VS. ITO, WARD-2(4) AHMEDABAD. ( (( ( -. -. -. -. / APPELLANT) ( (( (/0-. /0-. /0-. /0-. / RESPONDENT) 1& 2 3 )/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE + 2 3 )/ REVENUE BY : SHRI B.L. YADAV, SR.DR 5 2 &(*/ DATE OF HEARING : 9 TH JULY, 2014 678 2 &(*/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08/08/2014 )9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THESE TWO APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2007-2008 ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A). 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE-APPELLANT. NO APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE. ON EARLIER OCCASION ON 10.4.2014, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. IN THESE ITA NO.1175 AND 1176/AHD/2011 -2- FACTS, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTE RESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEALS. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE A PPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMI SSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( %&'( %&'( %&'( %&'( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) )* + )* + )* + )* + /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD