Mukesh B. Chhutani, Kolhapur V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, (Central), Circle, Kolhapur

ITA 1176/PUN/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1606 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-07-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 02-08-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 13

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, PUNE (THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, J UDICIAL MEMBER SL. NO. ITA NO. NAME OF APPELLANT NAME OF RESPONDENT ASST. YEAR 1 1286/PUN/2019 ADVENT HEALTHCARE & HITECH PRODUCTS, FLAT NO. 9, RAJYOG SOCIETY, PUNE SATARA ROAD, PARVATI, PUNE - 411009 PAN : AANFA2392J DCIT, CIRCLE - 4, PUNE 2015 - 16 2 TO 5 1174 TO 1177/PUN/2019 SHRI MUKESH BAGWANDAS CHHUTANI, 38 - E WARD, SHIVDARSHAN CO - OP. HOUSING SOCIETY, NAGALA PARK, KOLHAPUR - 416003 PAN : AASPC4542R ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLHAPUR 2012 - 13 TO 2015 - 16 6 1846/PUN/2018 HUKUMCHAND BANSILAL KALANTRI, D - 22, KALANTRI FOOD PRODUCTS, MARKET YARD, LATUR - 413512 PAN : ABAPK9456F ACIT, LATUR CIRCLE, LATUR 2014 - 15 7 244/PUN/2018 M/S. MAHALAXMI DISTRIBUTORS, SDL HEIGHTS, 4 TH FLOOR, BEHIND PATIDAR BHAVAN, MADHAVNAGAR ROAD, SANGLI PAN : AAFFM0228F ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, SANGLI 2013 - 14 8 315/PUN/2017 SACHIN NAMDEO DHOKANE, AT & POST UMBARE, TALUKA RAHURI, DISTRICT AHMEDNAGAR - 413705 PAN : ASEPD2125M ADDL. CIT, AHMEDNAGAR RANGE, AHMEDNAGAR 2010 - 11 9 258/PUN/2019 KAILASH SATYANARAYAN PARASHRAMPURIA (HUF), 6, JANKI KUTIR, NAVASHYA GANPATI NAGAR, ANANDVALI, GANGAPUR ROAD, NASHIK - 422013 PAN : AAIHK2913E ITO, WARD 1(3), NASHIK 2014 - 15 ASSESSEE BY SL. NO. 1 TO 9 - NONE REVENUE BY SL. NO. 1 TO 5 SHRI VITTHAL BHOSALE SL. NO. 6 TO 8 SHRI S.P. WALIMBE DATE OF HEARING 0 1 - 07 - 2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 01 - 0 7 - 2021 2 / ORDER THESE NINE APPEALS BY DIFFERENT ASSESSEES FOR THE DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS MENTIONED IN THE CAPTION ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS). 2. WE FIND THAT ALL THE ASSESSEES WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN VIEW OF HAVING FILED APPLICATIONS UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME PROOF OF WHICH THE FORM NO. 3 IS ENCLOSED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. 3. THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTION IN CASE ALL THE ASSESSEES WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS. 4. IN VIEW OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEES ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01 ST JULY, 202 1 . SD/ - SD/ - ( R.S. SYAL ) ( S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI ) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE; / DATED : 01 ST JULY, 202 1 . RK / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT. 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. / THE CIT CONCERNED 5. , , , / DR, ITAT, A BENCH, PUNE. 6. / GUARD FILE. // // TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / PRIVATE SECRETARY, , / ITAT, PUNE