IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH I, MUMBAI BEFORE G.S. PANNU VICE- PRESIDENT AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS.1190&1191/MUM/2017(A.Y.2016-17) TATA STEEL LIMITED, BOMBAY HOUSE, 24, HOMI MODY STREET, FORT, MUMBAI 400 021 PAN: AAACT 2803M ...... APPELLANT VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAX) - 4(1)(2), ROOM NO.1722, 17 TH FLOOR, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400 021 ..... RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI DEVANG S. SHETH, RESPONDENT BY : SHRI NISHANT SAMA IYA DATE OF HEARING : 17/12/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19/12/2018 ORDER PER G.S.PANNU,VICE-PRESIDENT: THE CAPTIONED APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE F OR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 ARE DIRECTED AGAINST OR DERS PASSED BY CIT(A)-55, MUMBAI DATED 07/11/2017. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD.REPRESENTATIVE F OR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE DOES NOT WANT TO PURSUE THE CAPTIONED APPEALS AND HAS FILED LETTERS SIGNE D BY THE HEAD- TAX(TAX ADMINISTRATION & PLANNING) OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. THE CONTENTS OF THE ASSESSEES LETTERS ARE IDENTICAL AN D READ AS UNDER:- 2 ITA NOS.1190&1191/MUM/2017(A.Y.2016-17) WE HEREBY PRAY TO THE HONBLE BENCH TO GRANT LEAV E TO US TO WITHDRAW THE AFORESAID APPEAL, HAVING REGARD TO THE SMALLNESS OF THE TAX AMOUNT INVOLVED. WE REQUEST THE APPROVAL OF THE HONBLE MEMBERS FOR THE SAME. 2.THE INCONVENIENCE CAUSED TO THE HONBLE BENCH IS SINCERELY REGRETTED. 3. LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19/12 /2018 SD/- SD/- (AMARJIT SINGH) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE-PRESIDENT MUMBAI, DATED 19/12/2018 VM , SR. PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT , 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI