IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, B ENGALURU BEFORE S HRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I TA NO. 1 195 / BANG/2 0 1 8 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 15 ) SHRI RAVINDAR S.SHETTY, FLAT NO.101, KUMARA ASHRAY A, NO.38, CURLEY STREET, RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU - 560025 . PAN: ADOPS6717J VS. APPELLANT INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 3 ( 1 )( 4 ) , BENGALURU. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : DR. G. MANOJ KUMAR, ADDL.CIT(DR) DATE OF HEARING : 04/06/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08 /06/2018 O R D E R PER I NTURI RAMA RAO, AM : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX(APPEALS) - 7 , [CIT(A) ] , BENGALURU , DATED 2 2 / 02 /201 8 FOR THE AS SESSMENT YEAR 201 4 - 15 . 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY APPEARED FOR ASSESSEE AND THERE WAS NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT ALSO . IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS CASE. WE D ISMISS THE APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 AND THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 , AS INFRUCTUOUS FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ITA NO . 1 195 /BANG/20 18 PAGE 2 OF 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 8 TH JUNE, 2018 SD/ - SD/ - (SUNIL KUMAR YADAV) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : BENGALURU. D A T E D : 08/06/2018 SRINIVASULU, SPS COPY TO : 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT(A) 4 CIT 5 DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE