SMT. KUSUM BADER, JAIPUR V. ITO, WARD 2(1), JAIPUR

ITA 1207/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7847 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-01-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 21-10-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1207/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14 KUSUM BADER, 14, TAKHTE SHAHI ROAD, J.L.N. MARG, JAIPUR (RAJASTHAN) CUKE VS. I.T.O., WARD 2(1), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAZPB 8939 Q VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION FILED. JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 12/01/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18/01/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 14/08/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2013-14. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: IN THE ABOVE CONNECTION, WE RESPECTFULLY AND MOST HUMBLY REQUEST YOU THAT WE DESIRE TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL FILED BY ITA 1207/JP/2019_ KUSUM BADER VS ITO 2 US AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT APPEAL, IN TERMS OF THE SCHEME OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS. COPY OF CERTIFICATE UNDER SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 5 OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (FORM-3) IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REFERENCE. THEREFORE, YOU ARE HEREBY REQUESTED TO KINDLY PASS NECESSARY ORDER IN THIS REGARD & OBLIGE. THANKING YOU YOURS FAITHFULLY (NARENDRA JAIN) COUNSEL 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA 1207/JP/2019_ KUSUM BADER VS ITO 3 TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 18/01/2021 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SMT. KUSUM BADER, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 2(1), JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1207/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR