1 ITA NO. 1207/KOL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-2006 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA D BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 1207/KOL./2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-2006 INCOME TAX OFFICER,................................ .........................APPELLANT WARD-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, P-7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA-700 069 -VS.- HIND SPECTRON MANUFACTURERS (P) LIMITED,........... .......RESPONDENT 36, MAHARSHI DEBENDRA ROAD, KOLKATA-700 006 [PAN: AAACH 8318 P] APPEARANCES BY: SHRI ARINDAM BHATTACHARJEE, ADDL. CIT, D.R., FOR TH E DEPARTMENT SHRI SUBASH AGARWAL, ADVOCATE, FOR THE ASSESSEE DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : DECEMBER 04, 2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : DECEMBER 04, 2017 O R D E R PER SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-16, KOLKATA DA TED 23.02.2016 AND THE SOLITARY ISSUE INVOLVED THEREIN RELATES TO THE DELETION BY THE LD. CIT(APPEALS) OF THE ADDITION OF RS.3,44,817/- MADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER ON ACCOUNT OF DISALLOWANCE OF DEPRECIATION BY WAY OF RECTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 154. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING FIXED IN THIS CASE TODAY, I.E. ON 04.12.2017, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, AT THE OUTSET, HA S POINTED OUT THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS LE SS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT FIXED BY THE CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 D ATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015 AT RS.10,00,000/- FOR FILING THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AND THIS POSITION CLEARLY EVIDENT FROM THE GROUND RAISED BY THE 2 ITA NO. 1207/KOL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-2006 REVENUE IN THIS APPEAL IS NOT DISPUTED EVEN BY THE LD. D.R. IN CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 (SUPRA) ISSUED BY THE CBDT, THE MONETARY LI MIT FOR FILING THE APPEALS BY THE REVENUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL HAS BEEN INCREASED TO RS.10,00,000/- AND AS CLARIFIED IN THE SAID CIRCULA R, THE SAID MONETARY LIMIT IS APPLICABLE RETROSPECTIVELY EVEN TO THE APP EALS PENDING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THE CBDT HAS ALSO INSTRUCTED THAT SUCH PE NDING APPEALS BELOW THIS SPECIFIED TAX LIMIT OF RS.10,00,000/- MAY BE W ITHDRAWN/ NOT PRESSED. KEEPING IN VIEW THE INSTRUCTION GIVEN BY THE CBDT V IDE CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015, WHICH IS SQUARELY APPLICA BLE IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IN THIS CASE IS TREATED AS WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED AND DISMISSED ACCORDINGLY. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 4 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017. SD/- SD/- (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (P.M. JAGTAP) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER KOLKATA, THE 4 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 COPIES TO : (1) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, P-7, CHOWRINGHEE SQUARE, KOLKATA-700 069 2) HIND SPECTRON MANUFACTURERS (P) LIMITED, 36, MAHARSHI DEBENDRA ROAD, KOLKATA-700 006 (3) CIT(APPEALS)-16, KOLKATA, (4) CIT- , KOLKATA, (5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE TRUE COPY BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY, HEAD OF OFFICE/DDO, INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA LAHA/SR. P.S.