1 ITA NO.121/KOL/2015 AMRI HOSPITAL LTD., AY 2010-11 , D , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH: KOL KATA () BEFORE .., /AND . ' # $% % , ) [BEFORE SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, A M] I.T.A. NO. 121/KOL/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA. VS. M/S. AMRI HOSPITAL LTD. (PAN: AAECS6786N) APPELLANT RESPONDENT DATE OF HEARING 06.09.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 04.10.2017 FOR THE APPELLANT SHRI KALYAN NATH, ADDL. CIT, DR FOR THE RESPONDENT SHRI NARAYAN PODDAR, AR ORDER PER SHRI A.T.VARKEY, JM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-1, KOLKATA DATED 08.10.2014 FOR AY 2010-11. 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBM ITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL OF REVENUE IS MORE OR LESS RS.7,11,020/ - WHICH IS LESS THAN RS. TEN LAKHS. HENCE, DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE PROCEEDED WITH. WE FIND THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE FALLS IN THE KEN OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 DATED 10.12.2015, WHEREIN THE CBDT HAS DIRECTED THE DEPARTMENT TO WIT HDRAW/NOT PRESS THE APPEAL IF THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS. 10 LACS BEFORE THE ITAT. O N PERUSAL OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 21 / 2015 DATED 10.12.2015 AND THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON REC ORD, WE FIND THAT THE REVENUES CASE DOES NOT FALL UNDER ANY OF THE EXCEPTION CLAUSE AS PROVI DED IN THE CIRCULAR, AS THIS IS COVERED. WE ALSO FIND THAT THE CIRCULAR MAKES IT VERY CLEAR THA T THE REVISED MONETARY LIMITS SHALL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING APPEALS ALSO. WE FIND TH AT THE CIRCULAR IS BINDING ON THE TAX AUTHORITIES. THIS POSITION HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY TH E HONBLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS VS INDIAN OIL CORPORATION L TD REPORTED IN 267 ITR 272 (SC). 2 ITA NO.121/KOL/2015 AMRI HOSPITAL LTD., AY 2010-11 HENCE, WE HOLD THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESER VES TO BE DISMISSED IN TERMS OF LOW TAX EFFECT VIDE CIRCULAR NO.21 / 2015 DATED 10.12.2015. ACCORDINGLY, THIS BEING A LOW TAX EFFECT CASE, WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF REVENUE IN LIMINE, AS UNADMITTED, WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE. IN CASE THE REVENUE LATER FIND S THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS MORE THAN RS. 10 LAKHS THEN IT IS AT LIBERTY TO MOVE APPROPRIATE APP LICATION TO RECALL THIS ORDER. WITH THIS CAVEAT, WE ARE INCLINED TO DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF T HE REVENUE ON THE GROUND THAT IT IS BELOW THE TAX EFFECT OF LESS THAN RS.10 LAKH. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 04.10.2017 . SD/- SD/- (DR. A. L. SAINI) (ABY. T. VARKEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 4 TH OCTOBER, 2017 JD.(SR.P.S.) COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1 . APPELLANT DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA 2 RESPONDENT M/S. AMRI HOSPITAL LTD., P-4 & 5, CIT, SCHEME, LXXII, BLOCK-A, GARIAHAT ROAD, KOLKATA-700 029. 3 . THE CIT(A), KOLKATA 4. 5. CIT , KOLKATA DR, KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA / TRUE COPY, BY ORDER, SR. PVT. SECRETARY