IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.1236/DEL/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 3, NEW DELHI. VS. ANISH GUPTA, A- 67, GUJRANWALAN TOWN, PHASE- 1, NEW DELHI. PAN : APOPG8894Q (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI RAGHUNATH, SR.DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI PRANSHU SINGHAL, CA DATE OF HEARING : 19-09-2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 19-09-2018 O R D E R PER R. K. PANDA, AM : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINS T THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2014 OF THE CIT(A)- 23, NEW DELHI RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, AT THE OUTSET, SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS BE LOW RS.20 LAKHS. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE LATEST CBDT CIRCULAR NO.03/2018 [F.N O.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ (PT)] DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 WHICH IS APPLICABLE EVEN TO PENDING APP EALS, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 3. THE LD. DR ON THE OTHER HAND FAIRLY ADMITTED THA T THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE IMPUGNED APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS AND THEREFORE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE HAS TO BE DISMISSED. HE, HOWEVER, R EQUESTED THAT IF AT ANY POINT OF TIME IT IS NOTICED THAT THE CASE OF THE REVENUE FALLS UNDER ANY OF THE AMENDED 2 ITA NO.1236/DEL/2015 PARA 10 OF THE CIRCULAR VIDE NOTIFICATION DATED 20. 08.2018, THE REVENUE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RE VIVAL OF THE APPEAL. 4. AFTER HEARING BOTH THE SIDES, WE FIND THE TAX EF FECT INVOLVED IN THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE REVENUE IN THE IMPUGNED APPEA L IS ADMITTEDLY BELOW RS.20 LAKHS. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE RE VENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.03/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 WHICH IS APPLICABLE EVEN TO PENDING APPEALS. HOWEVER, IF TH E REVENUE AT ANY POINT OF TIME FINDS THAT THE CASE OF THE REVENUE FALLS UNDER ANY OF THE CLAUSES AS PER AMENDED PARA 10 OF THE SAID CIRCULAR VIDE NOTIFICAT ION DATED 20.08.2018, THE REVENUE IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICA TION FOR REVIVAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED IN THE TERMS INDICATED ABOVE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF I.E. ON THIS 19 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018. SD/- SD/- (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (R. K. PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 19-09-2018. SUJEET COPY OF ORDER TO: - 1) THE APPELLANT 2) THE RESPONDENT 3) THE CIT 4) THE CIT(A) 5) THE DR, I.T.A.T., NEW DELHI BY ORDER //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI