HASMUKH KHETSHI SHAH, MUMBAI V. DCIT, CIR-23(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1251/MUM/2023

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Hasmukh Khetshi Shah against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which disallowed a sum of Rs.27,49,564 under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This disallowance pertained to the employees' contributions towards PF and ESI, which were allegedly not paid within the due dates prescribed by law. The appellant argued that the payments were made on the next working day following the due dates, which fell on public holidays. The respondent defended the original order, citing a Supreme Court decision that settled the issue of allowability of such contributions. The Tribunal decided to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer to confirm the actual dates of the contributions.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 133762 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-07-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2023
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 12-04-2023
• Other Referred Cases: Checkmate Services (P) Limited vs. CIT, 448 ITR 518(SC)
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act, 1961, General Clauses Act, 1897
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: USHA GAIKHWAD
• Section: 10

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण मुंबई पीठ “ एच ”,मुंबई ी ि क अ ी, ियक ए ं ु ी प! "ी, लेख क र के म% IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “ H”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER& MS. PADMAVATHY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअ ं.1251 /मुं/2023(िन. .2018-19) ITA NO.1251/MUM/2023(A.Y.2018-19) Hasmukh Khetshi Shah, 138/150, Dadi Sheth Agiyari Lane, Mumbai 400 002 PAN: AAPPS-1090-K ...... अपील 3/Appellant बन म Vs. DCIT, Cir.23(1), Matru Mandir, Mumbai 400 007. ..... 4ि" ी/Respondent / Appellant by : Shri Ashok Mehta /Respondent by : Smt. Usha Gaikhwad ुन ई की ि"ि / Date of hearing : 05/07/2023 घोषण की ि"ि / Date of pronouncement : 05/07/2023 आदेश/ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 29/03/2023, for the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised as many as five grounds in the appeal, all the grounds are on different facets of a single issue, i.e. disallowance of Rs.27,49,564/- made u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘ the Act’]. 2 ITA NO.1251/MUM/2023(A.Y.2018-19) 3. Shri Ashok Mehta appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted at the outset that the appeal may be restored to the file of Assessing Officer to consider the payments made by assessee towards Employees Contribution under ‘Provident Fund(PF) and Employees’ State Insurance Scheme(ESI). The Assessing Officer without taking note of the payments that have been made before the due date under the relevant laws made addition of the entire amount. The ld. Authorized Representative of the assessee further submits that payment for the month of August, 2017 and October, 2017 were due on 15/08/2017 and 15/10/2017, respectively. Since, 15 th August, 2017 and 15 th October,2017 were closed public holidays, the payments were made on the immediate next day i.e. 16 th August,2017 and 16 th Oct.2017. He pointed that as per section 10 of the General Clauses Act,1897, if the last day happens to be a closed holiday, the next day shall be considered as the ‘due date’. 4. Smt. Usha Gaikhwad representing the Department vehemently defended the impugned order and submitted that now the issue regarding allowability of contribution towards Employees’ share of PF and ESI. is settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Checkmate Services (P) Limited vs. CIT, 448 ITR 518(SC). 5. We have heard the submissions made by rival sides and have examined the orders of authorities below. Disallowance of Rs.27,49,564/- has been made u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Act. It is no more res-integra that Employees’ share of Contribution towards PF and ESI made after due date as specified under the respect laws is not an allowable deduction u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Act. The short contention of the assessee is that while making disallowance, the Assessing Officer had erred in disallowing the amounts that have been made 3 ITA NO.1251/MUM/2023(A.Y.2018-19) before the due date. The issue is restored back to the file of Assessing Officer for the limited purpose to examine the dates of contribution made by the assessee under PF and ESI. In case contributions are made on or before the due date as specified under the respective laws, no disallowance u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Act is warranted to that extent. The ground No.2 of the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose. 6. The ground No.1& 3to 5 of appeal are dismissed as no submissions were made in respect of the said grounds. 7. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on Wednesday the 5 th day of July, 2023. Sd/- Sd/- (PADMAVATHI. S) (VIKAS AWASTHY) लेखाकार /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ा क /JUDICIAL MEMBER मुंबई/ Mumbai, नांक/Dated 05/07/2023 Vm, Sr. PS(O/S) ितिलिप अ ेिषतCopy of the Order forwarded to : 1. 3/The Appellant , 2. 4 " / The Respondent. 3. The PCIT 4. 9 : 4 " . , आ . . ., मुबंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. : ;< = > /Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) Mumbai