Leelavati Vijaykumar Kotecha, Jalgaon V. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle -(1), Nashik

ITA 1257/PUN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9062 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-08-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 25-07-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: HARI KRISHAN

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” Ɋायपीठ पुणेमŐ। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं. / ITA No.1257/PUN/2018 िनधाᭅरणवषᭅ / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Leelavati Vijaykumar Kotecha, 4, Teachers Colony, Ring Road, Jalgaon – 425001. PAN: ALVPK 4435 H Vs The DCIT, CC-(1), Nashik. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by Shri Hari Krishan & Jaygobind Palai –AR Revenue by Shri S.P.Walilmbe – DR Date of hearing 29/07/2022 Date of pronouncement 08/08/2022 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-12, Pune for the A.Y. 2010-11 dated 27.04.2018, emanating out of order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The appeal came up hearing on 29 th July, 2022. At the time of hearing, Shri Hari Krishan & Jaygobind Palai appeared for the assessee. The ld.AR submitted that the appellant assessee has already been issued FORM NO.4 and settled dispute with Income Tax Department by availing the benefits of Vivad se Visvas Scheme ITA No.1257/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2010-11 Leelavati Vijaykumar Kotecha Vs. DCIT, CC-(1), Nashik [A] 2 -2020 (VSV-20). The ld.AR for the assessee further requested to withdraw this appeal. 3. On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative (DR) submits that he has no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. We have considered the contents of the withdrawal application filed by the assessee and the submissions of the Ld.DR for the Revenue. Considering the facts that the assessee has already filed application before the prescribed authority and settled the tax liability with the income–tax department under VSV-20 and have received FORM NO.4 vide Acknowledgement No.239637000040221 dated 11.06.2022 from designated authority, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn 5. In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the open Court on 8 th August, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ᳰदनांक / Dated : 8 th August, 2022/ SGR* ITA No.1257/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2010-11 Leelavati Vijaykumar Kotecha Vs. DCIT, CC-(1), Nashik [A] 3 आदेशकᳱᮧितिलिपअᮕेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथᱮ / The Appellant. 2. ᮧ᭜यथᱮ / The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A), concerned. 4. The Pr. CIT, concerned. 5. िवभागीयᮧितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “ए” बᱶच, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. 6. गाडᭅफ़ाइल / Guard File. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे/ITAT, Pune.