CRESCENT FINSTOCK LTD, MUMBAI V. ACIT 4(1), MUMBAI

ITA 1263/MUM/2012

• Counselvise Citation: 126319914 RSA 2012
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2013
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 23-02-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHANDRAJIT SINGH
• Assessee Lawyers: WITHDRAWAL LETTER DT

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C MUMBAI . . , / !' , # $ % BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER /AND SHRI N.K.BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO. 1263/MUM/2012 ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 CRESCENT FINSTOCK LIMITED, 1 ST FLOOR, KANTA TERRACE, 533, KALBADEVI ROAD, MUMBAI 40002 / VS. THE ACIT 4(1), ROOM NO.640, AAYKAR BHAVAN, MK ROAD, MUMBAI 400 020. ( # ./ )* ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAACC 6420F ( (+ / APPELLANT ) .. ( ,-(+ / RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY WITHDRAWAL LETTER DT.24/09/2013 RESPONDENT BY : SHRI CHANDRAJIT SINGH . /# / DATE OF HEARING : 25/09//2013 01' . /# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25/09/2013 2 / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, JM: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-8, MUMBAI DATED 26/12/2011 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008- 09. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED 24/09/2013 REQUESTING FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. THE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER READ AS UNDER: . / ITA NO. 1263/MUM/2012 ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 2 RE:ITAT APPEAL NO.1263/MUM-2012-IT AY 2008-09- CRE SCENT FINSTOCK LIMIED.(APPELLANT) VS. ACIT 4(1), MUMBAI- PRAYER FO R WITHDRAWING OF SAID APPEAL. WE HAVE FILED AN APPEAL BEFORE THE HONBLE TRIBUNAL FOR THE A.Y 2008-09 CONSISTING OF ONLY ONE GROUND OF APPEAL AS STATED A BOVE. THE MATTER HAS BEEN POSED FOR HEARING ON 25/09/2013 BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH. SIR, WE DO NOT WISH TO PROCEED WITH THE APPEAL AND HENCE PRAY THAT WE BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL. WE SINCERELY REGRET THE INCONVENIENCE CAUSED. LD. DR DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION FOR SUCH REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE, THEREFORE, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDREW THE APPEAL AS PE R AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST. THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WI THDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 25/09/2013 2 . 01' # 3 45 25 /09/2013 1 . 6 % SD/- SD/- ( !' / N.K.BILLAIYA ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) # / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 4 DATED 25/09/2013 2 2 2 2 . .. . ,/78 ,/78 ,/78 ,/78 98'/ 98'/ 98'/ 98'/ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. (+ / THE APPELLANT 2. ,-(+ / THE RESPONDENT. 3. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. : / CIT 5. 8;6 ,/ , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 6< = / GUARD FILE. 2 2 2 2 / BY ORDER, -8/ ,/ //TRUE COPY// > >> > / ? ? ? ? ) ) ) ) (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI . . ./ VM , SR. PS