Ramu Lakshmanan, Chennai V. ITO, NCW10(3), Chennai

ITA 1274/CHNY/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 100 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0331 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-08-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 21-07-2024
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 30-04-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SAMANTHA LD
• Keywords: Set aside
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” ायपीठ चे ई म । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय ी महावीर िसंह, उपा ! एवं माननीय ी मनोज कुमार अ%वाल ,लेखा सद( के सम!। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.1274/Chn y/2024 (िनधा)रण वष) / As sessment Year: 2017-18) Shri Ramu Lakshmanan Old No.43, New No.58, Velalla Street, Aminjikarai, Chennai-600 029. बनाम / Vs . ITO Non-Corporate Ward-10(3) Chennai. थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. ABXPL-8390-C (अपीलाथ /Appellant) : ( थ / Respondent) अपीलाथ कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri R.Venkataraman (CA) -Ld. AR थ कीओरसे/Respondent by : Smt. Samantha (Addl.CIT) -Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 22-07-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 08-08-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of an order passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] on 06-03-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s 143(3) of the Act on 12-12-2019. 2. In the assessment order, Ld. AO has made addition of Rs.71.96 Lacs u/s.69A r.w.s 115BBE which represent cash deposits during demonetization period from 09-11-2016 to 30-12-2016 in Andhra Bank, Shenoy Nagar Branch, Chennai. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the impugned addition since the assessee failed to appear during appellate proceedings. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR has prayed for another opportunity of hearing which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR. The Ld. AR also submitted that the submissions were uploaded during appellate proceedings which have not been considered. 3. Though the assessee has remained negligent, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its case. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication after affording opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith failing which Ld. CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with disposal of appeal on merits on the basis of material on record. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 8 th August, 2024 Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) उपा34 / VICE PRESIDENT लेखा सद6 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER चे8ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated :08-08-2024 DS आदेशकीKितिलिपअ%ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ /Appellant 2. थ /Respondent 3. आयकरआयु@/CIT Chennai. 4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR 5. गाडEफाईल/GF