, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI . , . !' , # $ BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1290/MDS./2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR :2010-11) M/S.INDIAN SOCIELTY FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING, MODULE NO.60 & 61 , READYMADE GARMENT COMPLEX, SIDCO INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI 600 032. VS. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION UNIT-IV, CHENNAI 600 034. PAN AAAFI 1826 N ( %& / APPELLANT ) ( '(%& / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : MR.P.RADHAKRISHNAN,JCIT D.R / DATE OF HEARING : 15.07.2015 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15.07.2015 ) / O R D E R PER A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, AGGRIEVED B Y THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A)-VII, CHEN NAI DATED 16.03.2015 IN ITA NO.239/13-14 PASSED UNDER SEC.1 43(3) READ WITH SECTION SEC. 250 OF THE ACT. ITA NO. 1290/MDS/15 2 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE TO PURSUE THE APPEAL. TH EREFORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN CONDUCTING THE CASE, HENCE FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BE NCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD.(38 ITD 320) (DEL.), WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUS ION OF HEARING ON 15 TH JULY, 2015 . SD/- SD/- ( . !' ) (V. DURGA RAO) ( . ) (A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED THE 15 TH JULY, 2015. K S SUNDARAM. COPY TO: ASSESSEE/AO/CIT (A)/CIT/D.R./GUARD FILE