, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BE NCH SMC CHANDIGARH !', # BEFORE: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER /. ITA NO. 1294/CHD/2019 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 SHRI RAJINDER KUMAR, H.NO. 452, SUKHNA ENCLAVE, VILLAGE KANSAL, BLOCK-C, MOHALI. VS THE ITO, WARD 1(3), CHANDIGARH. ./ PAN NO. : ANGPK0230R / APPELLANT / RESPONDENT ! / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI TEJ MOHAN SINGH, ADVOCATE ' ! / REVENUE BY : SHRI ARVIND SUDERSHAN, JCIT-DR # $ % / DATE OF HEARING : 24.06.2020 &'() % / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 26 .06.2020 / ORDER THE ASSESSEE BY WAY OF AN APPLICATION ADDRESSED FOR A WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED WHEREIN THE CORRECTN ESS OF THE ORDER DATED 18.07.2019 OF CIT(A)-1 CHANDIGARH PERTA INING TO 2011-12 ASSESSMENT IS ASSAILED ON VARIOUS GROUNDS. 2. THE WITHDRAWAL IS REQUESTED ON THE FOLLOWING GR OUND : I HEREBY WITHDRAW MY APPEAL FILED BY ME ON 27.09.2 019 VIDE ITA 1294/CHANDI/2019 AS I HAVE OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX/PENALTY UNDER VIVAD SE VISH WAS SCHEME.. ITA 1294 /CHD/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 PAGE 2 OF 2 3. MR. T.M. SINGH, ADVOCATE REQUESTS THAT PERMISSIO N TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THE ORDER MAY BE GIVEN IN THE EVENT UALITY THE APPEAL IS NOT CONCLUDED UNDER VIVAD SE VISHVAS SCH EME. 4. THE LD. SR.DR WAS HEARD WHO HAD NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAWAL SUBJECT TO THE ABOVE PRAYER. 5. I HAVE HEARD THE SUBMISSIONS. ON CONSIDERATION O F THE SAME AND IN THE LIGHT OF THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE , THE WITHDRAWAL IS PERMITTED. SAID ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING ITSELF. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 26 TH JUNE,2020. SD/- ( ) (DIVA SINGH) / JUDICIAL MEMBER POONAM / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. / CIT 4. ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER, / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR