Shri Hiteshbhai Ramanbhai Patel, Anand V. The ACIT.,Circle-3, Baroda

ITA 1296/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 80460 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-11-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 02-05-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: M K SINGH SR DR

Judgement Text

, , , , C, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, C BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'(, , , , )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' )* + ) ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.1296/AHD/2011 [ASSTT.YEAR 2007-2008] HITESHBHAI RAMANBHAI PATEL PROP. HITESH TOBACCO AT. PAMOL TA. BORSAD (ANAND) PAN AJHPP 8514 E /VS. ACIT, CIR.3 BARODA. ( (( ( -. -. -. -. / APPELLANT) ( (( ( /0-. /0-. /0-. /0-. / RESPONDENT) 1& 2 3 ) / ASSESSEE BY : NONE + 2 3 ) / REVENUE BY : SHRI M.K. SINGH, SR.DR 5 2 &(* / DATE OF HEARING : 16 TH SEPTEMBER, 2014 678 2 &(* / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03/11/2014 )9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSTT.YEAR 2007-2008 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE OR DER OF THE CIT(A)-I, BARODA, DATED 25.2.2011. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF O F THE ASSESSEE- APPELLANT. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED APPLICATION DATE D 16.9.2014 FOR ADJOURNMENT, BUT NO REASON WHATSOEVER FOR SEEKING A DJOURNMENT HAS BEEN ITA NO.1296/AHD/2011 -2- MENTIONED IN THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE. THE CONTENTS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE ARE REPRODUCED HEREINBE LOW: ADJOURNEMNT APPLICATION THE ABOVE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING TODAY. YOUR HONOURS ARE REQUESTED TO ADJOURN THE SAME & OBLIGE. SD/- FOR APPELLANT AHMEDABAD DATE : 16/9/2014. ON THE EARLIER OCCASION ALSO, THE CASE OF THE ASSES SEE WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT TAKE N PRECAUTION OF EVEN DEPUTING SOMEBODY TO SEEK ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE O F HEARING I.E. TODAY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSES SEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLO WING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (IND IA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( %&'( %&'( %&'( %&'( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) )* + )* + )* + )* + /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD