ITO, Bangalore V. Smt. K.S. Subhadramma, Bangalore

ITA 1298/BANG/2015

• Counselvise Citation: 129821114 RSA 2015
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-12-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 29-12-2015
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 29-10-2015
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DR P K SRIHARI
• Keywords: Audit objection; Tax effect

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1298 / BANG/20 1 5 (ASSESSMENT YEAR S : 2006 - 07 ) INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(2)(3) , B ANGALORE. VS. APPELLANT SMT. K.S.SUBHADRAMMA, NO.29, MIDDLE SCHOOL ROAD, V V PURAM, BANGALORE. RESPONDENT A PPELLANT BY: DR.P.K.SRIHARI, ADDL.CIT(DR) RESPONDENT BY: SHRI SUKRUTH N SEGU, CA. DATE OF HEARING : 29/12/2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 29 / 12 /2015. O R D E R PER SMT.ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JM: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY REVENUE DIRECTED AGAINST ORDER DATED 20/07/2015 OF CIT(A) - 5 , BANGALORE, FOR A. Y. 2006 - 07 . 02. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR H EARING LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL WAS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS FOR THE IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT YEAR AND BY VIRTUE OF CIRCULAR NO.21/2015, DT.10.12.2015, BELOW THE LIMITS LAID DOWN FOR FILING APPEALS BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. ITA NO.1298/BANG/2015 SMT. K.S.SUBHADRAMMA PAGE 2 OF 3 03. LD. DR SUBMITTED THAT PARA 8 OF THE CIRCULAR WAS NOT APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE. THEREFORE HE DID NOT OBJECT TO THE APPLICATION OF THE CIRCULAR. HOWEVER LD DR STATED THAT EXISTENCE OR NOT OF ANY REVENUE AUDIT OBJECTIONS LEADING TO THE FI LING OF THE APPEAL NEEDED TO BE ASCERTAINED. 04. WE HAVE PERUSED THE ORDERS AND HEARD THE CONTENTIONS. PARA 4 OF THE CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 (SUPRA) IS REPRODUCED HEREUNDER : 4. FOR THIS PURPOSE, TAX EFFECT MEANS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TAX ON THE TOTA L INCOME ASSESSED AND THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUES AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS INTENDED TO BE FILED (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS DISPUTED ISSUES ). HOWEVER THE TAX WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY INTEREST THEREON, EXCEPT WHERE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST ITSELF IS IN DISPUTE. IN CASE THE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST IS THE ISSUE UNDER DISPUTE, THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST SHALL BE THE TAX EFFECT. IN CASES WHERE RETURNED LOSS IS REDUCED OR ASSESSED AS INCOME, THE TAX EFFECT WOULD INCLUDE NOTIONAL TAX ON DISPUTED ADDITIONS. IN CASE OF PENALTY ORDERS, THE TAX EFFECT WILL MEAN QUANTUM OF PENALTY DELETED OR REDUCED IN THE ORDER TO BE APPEALED AGAINST. 05. THE TAX EFFECT ON THE ISSUES AND / OR THE PENALTY THAT IS DISPUTED BY THE REVENUE IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS FOR THE IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT YEAR / YEARS. CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF ANY PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OR RULES NOR THE LEGALITY OR VIRES OF ANY BOARD ORDER, NOTIFICATION, INSTRUCTION OR CI RCULAR WAS AN ISSUE BEFORE THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. REVENUE HAS NOT BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE ANYTHING TO SHOW THAT THE APPEAL AROSE ON AN ISSUE EMANATING FROM ANY REVENUE AUDIT OBJECTIONS ACCEPTED BY THE ITA NO.1298/BANG/2015 SMT. K.S.SUBHADRAMMA PAGE 3 OF 3 DEPARTMENT. ADDITION GIVING RISE TO THE APPEALS DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN ASSETS / BANK ACCOUNTS. THUS WE FIND THAT THE CIRCULAR NO.21/ 2015 (SUPRA) IS SQUARELY APPLICABLE IN THIS CASE. HOWEVER IF REVENUE, AT A LATER STAGE FIND THAT APPEAL ARISE OUT OF ISSUES EMANATING FROM AUDIT OBJECTI ON IT WILL BE FREE TO FILE MP FOR RECALLING THIS ORDER. 06. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29 TH DECEMBER , 201 5 . SD/ - SD/ - (ABRAHAM P GEORGE) ( SMT.ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER E KSRINIVASULU ,SPS COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME - TAX APPELLATE T RIBUNAL BANGALORE