IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 1308/HYD/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 9(1), HYDERABAD. VS. RAYANCHA HOUSING DEVELOPERS, HYDERABAD PAN AAIFR 9383 H (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI SITHARAM ASSESSEE BY : NONE DATE OF HEARING 18-12-2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 18 -12-2015 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, A.M.: THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(APPEALS)- 7, HYDERABAD DATED 31.08.2015 FOR AY 2007-08. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT-ASSESS EE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THIS APPEAL. HOWEVER, WE PROCEE D TO DISPOSE OF THIS APPEAL AS THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPE AL IS LESS THAN RS. 10 LAKHS. THEREFORE, REVENUES APPEAL IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015. ON GOING THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER, WE FIND THAT THE TOT AL INCOME ASSESSED BY THE A.O. IS AT RS. 85,95,520 AND THE TA X EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS LESS THAN RS . 10 LAKHS AND THIS POSITION HAS NOT BEEN DISPUTED BY THE LEARNED DR. THEREFORE, WE ARE 2 ITA NO. 1308 /HYD/2015 RAYANCHA HOUSING DEVELOPERS, HYD. WAIVING THE SERVICE OF NOTICE TO THE ASSESSEE AND A RE PROCEEDING TO DISMISS THIS APPEAL ON THE BASIS OF THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR. 3. ON PERUSAL OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATE D 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015, WE FIND THAT THE CBDT HAS FIXED THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING OF APPEALS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, HONBLE HIGH COURT AND HONBLE SUPREME COURT RESPECTIVELY. THE MONETARY LI MIT FIXED FOR FILING OF APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS RS.10 LAKHS AND IT IS ALSO CLARIFIED THAT THE TAX EFFECT MEANS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TAX ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED AND THE TAX THAT WOULD HA VE BEEN CHARGEABLE ON SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEING REDUCED BY TH E AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUES AGAINST WHICH, APPE AL IS INTENDED TO BE FILED AND ALSO THAT THE TAX WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY INTEREST THEREON, EXCEPT WHERE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST ITSELF IS IN DISPUTE. PARA-10 OF THE INSTRUCTION ALSO CLARIFIES THAT THE INSTRUCTION WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO B E FILED HENCEFORTH IN THE HIGH COURTS/TRIBUNAL AND HAS DIRECTED THE DE PARTMENT TO EITHER WITHDRAW OR NOT PRESS THE APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIFI ED TAX LIMITS. DULY TAKING NOTE OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 DATED 1 0 TH DECEMBER, 2015, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE WITH THE LIBERTY TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RECALL OF THIS ORDER IF THIS CASE F ALLS WITHIN ANY OF THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE CBDT CIRCULAR MENTIONED THEREIN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISS ED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH DECEMBER, 2015. SD/- SD/- (P. MADHAVI DEVI) (S. RIFAUR RAH MAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 18 TH DECEMBER, 2015 KV 3 ITA NO. 1308 /HYD/2015 RAYANCHA HOUSING DEVELOPERS, HYD. COPY TO:- 1) DCIT, CIRCLE 9(1) 2 RD FLOOR, D-BLOCK, I.T. TOWERS, AC GUARDS, HYDERABAD. 2) M/S RAYANCHA HOUSING DEVELOPERS, 16-2-141/3, DAY ANAND NAGAR COLONY, MALAKPET, HYDERABAD. 3 CIT(A)- 7, HYDERABAD 4) PR. CIT - 7, HYDERABAD 5) THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, I.T.A.T., HYDE RABAD.