RAYMOND LTD, MUMBAI V. DY. CI.T. CENT. CIR. - 44 (AFTER RESTRUCTURING NOW KNOWN AS DY.C.I.T. CENT. CIR. - 8(1)), MUMBAI

ITA 133/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0051 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-12-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 05-01-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: KUNAL PANDAY
• Keywords: Competent authority
• Section: 260A; 13

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT) D BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL , HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO S . 132, 133, 134 & 3577 /MUM/201 8 (A.Y S : 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09 , 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13 ) RAYMOND LIMITED NEW HIND HOUSE NAROTTAM M ORARJEE MARG BALLARD ESTATE MUMBAI 400001 PAN: AAACR4896A V. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 44 {AFTER RESTRUCTURING NOW KNOWN AS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 8(1)} 6 TH FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAVAN MUMBAI 400020 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI KUNAL PANDAY DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI BHARAT ANDHLE DATE OF HEARING : 29.12.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29.12.2020 O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD (JM) 1. THESE APPEAL S ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST DIFFERENT ORDER S OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 50 , MUMBAI [HEREINAFTER IN SHORT LD.CIT(A)] DATED 25.04.2014 FOR THE A.Y S . 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 AND DATED 27.03.2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2010 - 11 . 2 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED 2. ASSESSEE VIDE LETTER DATED 28 .12.2020 & 29 .12 .2020 SOUGHT FOR ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASES AS ASSESSEE OPTING FOR THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME. CONTENTS OF THE LETTER DATED 28.12.2020 ARE AS UNDER: - WE DRAW YOUR HONOR'S ATTENTION TO THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON 29.12.2020 IN RESPECT OF THE CAPTIONED APPEAL MATTERS. IN THIS REGARD, WE HUMBLY SUBMIT THAT OUT OF THE CAPTIONED APPEALS, THE ASSESSEE IS OPTING FOR THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME' ANNOUNCED IN THE UNION BUDGET, 2020 WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING APPEALS: A.Y. ITA NO. APPELLANT 2007 - 08 132/MUM/2018 ASSESSEE APPEAL 2009 - 10 134/MUM/2018 ASSESSEE APPEAL 2012 - 13 3577/MUM/2018 ASSESSEE APPEAL WITH RESPECT TO THE OTHER APPEALS, WE HUMBLY REQUEST YOUR HONOR TO GRANT US AN ADJOURNMENT SINCE THE ASSESSEE IS OCCUPIED IN FILING FORM 1 OF VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEALS AND ALSO FOR THE APPEALS PERTAINING TO OTHER GROUP COMPANI ES. THEREFORE, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOUR TO DISPOSE OF THE ASSESSEE APPEALS FOR A.Y. 2007 - 08, 2009 - 10 AND 2012 - 13. FURTHER WE ALSO REQUEST YOUR HONORS TO KINDLY GRANT US AN ADJOURNMENT FOR AY 2006 - 07 (CROSS APPEALS) AND REVENUE APPEALS FOR A.Y. 2007 - 08, 2009 - 10 AND 2012 - 13 AND TAKE UP THE MATTERS AT A LATER DATE. 3. ASSESSEE VIDE LETTER DATED 29 .12.2020 SUBMITTED AS UNDER: - WE DRAW YOUR HONOR'S ATTENTION TO THE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR TODAY IN RESPECT OF THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEARS. WE HUMBLY SUBMIT THAT OUT OF THE CAPTIONED APPEALS, THE APPELLANT ASSESSEE IS OPTING FOR THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME' ANNOUNCED IN THE UNION BUDGET, 2020 WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING APPEALS: A.Y. ITA NO. APPELLANT 2008 - 09 133 /MUM/2018 ASSESSEE APPEAL 3 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED WITH RESPECT TO THE APPEALS OTHER THAN AFOREMENTIONED APPEALS, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOR TO GRANT US AN ADJOURNMENT AS THE ASSESSEE IS OCCUPIED IN FILING FORM 1 OF VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEALS AND APPEALS OF OTHER GROUP COMPANIES WHI CH IS TIME BARRING 31.12.2020. THEREFORE, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOUR TO KINDLY GRANT US AN ADJOURNMENT AND TAKE UP THE MATTERS AT A LATER DATE. 4. ON A PERUSAL OF THE ABOVE LETTER S OF THE ASSESSEE IT IS NOTICED THAT ASSESSEE IS IN THE PROCESS OF OPTING FOR VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME. THEREFORE, SINCE ASSESSEE IS CONTEMPLATING TO SETTLE LITIGATION UNDER VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME NO PURPOSE WOULD SERVE KEEPING THESE APPEAL S PENDING. 5. THE HON'BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) V. ACIT IN T.C .A. NO. 372 OF 2020 DATED 16.10.2020 ON AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE U/S. 260A OF THE ACT, HELD AS UNDER: - THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 260 A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ('THE ACT' FOR BREVITY), CHALLENGING THE ORDER DATED 03.12.2018 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI, 'A' BENCH ('THE TRIBUNAL' FOR BREVITY) IN I.T.A.NO.2576/CHNY/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011 - 12. THE APPE AL IS ADMITTED ON THE FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW: 1. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WAS PERVERSE IN NOT CONSIDERING ALL THE GROUNDS RAISED IN CROSS OBJECTION, VIZ. (1) CLAIM OF EXEMPTION I N RESPECT OF SALE OF AGRICULTURAL LAND (2) CLAIM OF DEDUCTION BY WAY OF COST INFLATION INDEX AND COST OF PLOT OF LAND PURCHASED IN COMPUTING DEDUCTION U/S.54F OF INCOME TAX ACT? 4 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED 2. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, THE INCOME TAX APPELLAT E TRIBUNAL WAS RIGHT IN LAW IN UPHOLDING THE DISALLOWANCE OF COST OF IMPROVEMENT IN PROVIDING MODERN KITCHEN IN THE FLATS PURCHASED? 2. WE HAVE HEARD MR.M.P.SENTHIL KUMAR, LEARNED COUNSEL APPEARING FOR THE APPELLANT/ASSESSEE AND MR.T.R.SENTHIL KUMAR, LEAR NED SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL AND M/S.K.G.USHA RANI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT/REVENUE. 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SC HEME ('VVS SCHEME' FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO.I. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATION ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED TAX AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. THE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ON 17TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DI SPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFFERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OR BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER SECTION 2 (J) DISPUTED TAX HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN TERMS OF SECTION 3 , WHERE A DECLARANT MEANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST DATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 IN RESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED IN THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 3 (A - C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN CASE, WHERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS FILED BY THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELLATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE SHALL BE ONE - HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCULATED ON SUCH ISSUE, IN SUCH A MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE SECOND PROVISO DEALS WITH THE CASES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE CO MMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE 5 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED RESOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROVISO DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDING BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION IS AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTICULARS TO BE FURNISHED ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4 . SECTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TI ME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND SECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUNITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RESTORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATIO N OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.I ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHALL PROCESS THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS P OSSIBLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX (6) WEEKS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FORM. 6. FOLLOWING THE ABOVE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT , THESE APPEAL S ARE DISPOSED OFF ACCORDINGLY , WITH LIBERTY TO THE ASSESSEE TO FILE A MISCELLANEOUS A PPLICATION , IN THE EVENT OF EITHER THE ASSESSEE NOT OPTING FOR VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AS CONTEMPLATED BY IT BEFORE THE DUE DATE OF THE SCHEME IN OPERATION OR IN THE EVENT OF THE DEPARTMENT NOT ACCEPTING THE APPLICATIONS MADE BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER THE SAID SCHEME, THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE RECALLED BY THE TRIBUNAL AND RESTORE D FOR ADJUDICATION ON MERITS . IT IS FURTHER MADE CLEAR THAT IF THE 6 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED ASSESSEE SEEKS TO RESTORE THE APPEAL S IN THE EVENT OF ASSESSEES DECLARATION MADE UNDER VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE REVENUE , THE REGISTRY SHALL NOT INSIST FOR FILING OF APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY, IF THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR RECALLING THE ORDER IS FILED BEYOND TIME ON AC COUNT OF DELAYED COMMUN IC ATION OF OUTCOME UNDER VIVAAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME IN VIEW OF THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) V. ACIT IN T.C.A. NO. 372 OF 2020 DATED 16.10.2020. WITH THESE OBSERVATIONS THESE A PPEAL S ARE DISPOSED OFF ACCORDINGLY . 7. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS OBSERVED ABOVE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE VIRTUAL COURT ON 29 . 12.2020 . SD/ - SD/ - ( MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL ) (C.N. PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI / DATED 2 9 / 12 / 2020 GIRIDHAR , S R. PS 7 ITA NOS. 132, 133, 134 & 3577/MUM/2018 (A.YS: 2007 - 08, 2008 - 09, 2009 - 10 & 2012 - 13) RAYMOND LIMITED COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUM