K.Mohammed Abdullah, Thanjavur V. ITO, Thanjavur

ITA 1343/CHNY/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8964 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-06-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2017
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 01-06-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: N MADHAVAN

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI , . , BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 1343/MDS/2015 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :20 11 - 1 2 SHRI K. MOHAMMED ABDULLAH, 1 - E, WEST STREET, ADIRAMPATTINAM, PATTUKOTTAI TK., TANJAVUR DT. 614 701. [PAN: A AOPM7271M ] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD I( 1 ), NANJ IKOTTAI ROAD, THANJAVUR. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI N. MADHAVAN , J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 13 . 0 6 .201 6 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 24 . 0 6 .201 6 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 2 , TIRUCHIRAPALLI , DATED 26 . 03 .20 1 5 RELEV ANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 11 - 1 2 . 2. AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WA S ADJOURNED WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 26.04.2016 AND THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS DULY ENDORSED IN THE ORDER SHEET HAVING NOTED THE NEXT DATE OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. HOWEVER, I.T.A. NO . 1343 /M/ 15 2 D ESPITE NOTING OF THE HEARING , WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING ON 13.06.2016, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR ANY ADJOURNMENT REQUEST HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRI BUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 24 TH JUNE , 201 6 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 24 . 0 6 .201 6 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.