AEN (O& M)AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED, SARADHNA V. DCIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

ITA 1376/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1653 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-12-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 18-12-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROONI PAUL DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: ANKUR SALAGIA
• Keywords: TDS
• Section: 2

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1374 TO 1376/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2016-17 (24Q 1ST QTR, 2ND QTR & 4TH QTR) ASSISTANT ENGINEER (O&M), AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED, SARADHNA, AJMER-305801 CUKE VS. D.C.I.T., CPC (TDS) GHAZIABAD. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AACCA 8562 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI ANKUR SALAGIA (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. ROONI PAUL (ADDL.CIT-DR) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 09/11/2020 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10/12/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: BENCH THESE ARE THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A), AJMER ALL DATED 09/07/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2016-17 (24Q 1 ST , QTR, 2 ND QTR & 4 TH QTR). 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEALS WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THESE APPEASL. THE CONTENTION OF THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: ITA 1374 TO 1376/JP/2019_ AEN(O&M) AVVNL VS DCIT 2 WITH REFERENCE TO ABOVE MENTIONED APPEAL, WE WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR NOTICE WE HAD FILED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT. AS PER SCHEME WE HAVE TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL, SO WE WANT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. KINDLY ACCEPT OUR APPLICATION. THANKING YOU YOURS SINCERELY AEN(O&M) AVVNL SARADHANA 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPEALS. ACCORDINGLY, ALL THESE THREE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSES ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THESE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 TH DECEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:-10/12/2020 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: ITA 1374 TO 1376/JP/2019_ AEN(O&M) AVVNL VS DCIT 3 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (O&M), AVVNL, SARDHANA. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE D.C.I.T., CPC (TDS) GHAZIABAD. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1374 TO 1376/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR