Rishi Pal Ashish Kumar Contractor, Shamli V. ITD, CPC, Bengaluru

ITA 1379/DEL/2021

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8937 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-02-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2019-2020
• Appeal Filed On: 04-10-2021
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ASHISH AGARWAL
• Section: 6; 43

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “F” DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.1379/DEL/2021 Assessment Year 2019-20 Rishi Pal Ashish Kumar Contractor, Dshish, Kherikarmu, Shamli v. ITD, CPC, Bengaluru. TAN/PAN: AAPFR5945Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Ashish Agarwal, Adv. Respondent by: Shri Ajay Kumar, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 14 02 2022 Date of pronouncement: 14 02 2022 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: The c apt io ne d ap p eal ha s be en f i le d at th e i ns ta nc e o f the ass es se e a ga in st t he or der of t he Co mmi s si on er of Inc o me Ta x (Ap pe al s) , Na ti on al F ace le ss Ap p eal Ce ntr e ( NF AC ) da te d 19. 08 .2 02 1 a ri si ng f ro m th e i nt i mat ion o rde r dat ed 10. 05 .2 02 0 pas se d b y th e A ss t. D ire ct or of I nc o me Ta x, C en tr al Pr oce ss in g Ce nte r, B an ga lor e, un de r Se ct io n 1 4 3(1 ) of t he In com e T ax A ct , 19 61 (t he A ct) c on c ern in g AY 2 01 9- 20 . 2. As pe r i ts gr ou n ds of ap pe al , t h e a ss ess ee h ere in ha s cha ll en ge d t he di sa llo wa nc e of Rs .6 2, 23, 65 7/ - on acco un t of d el a ye d pa yme nt of e mpl o yee’ s co ntr ib ut io n to war ds E P F a nd E SI . 3. W h en t he mat te r was ca lle d f or h ea rin g, ld. co unse l f or t he ass es se e, Sh ri A sh ish Ag ar wa l, Ad v. sub mi tt ed th at t h e i mpu gn ed I.T.A. No.1379/DEL/2021 2 e mplo ye e ’ s c on tr ib uti on t ow ar ds P F and E SI C ha s b een p ai d a nd dep os it ed b ef or e t he d ue d ate a ll o we d u/ s.1 3 9(1 ) altho ug h t he ass es se e h as re mi t ted th e p a yme nt b ela te dl y a nd be yo nd the d ue dat es s pe cif ie d in res pe ct s Act s. I t w as th us c ont en de d tha t wh er e the a ss es se e ha s co mpli ed wit h th e o bli ga ti on of payme nt to wa rd s e mplo ye e ’ s co nt ri b uti on bef or e t he d ue d at e, t he d ed u cti on s ar e all ow ab le u /s .3 6( 1 )(v a) of t he Act as h eld in sev e ral ju dic ia l pro no un ce me nt s in clu di ng t he dec is io n of Hon ’b le D el hi Hig h co ur t in th e c as e of Pr. CI T v s. Pr o In ter a cti ve Se rv ic e (In di a) Pv t. Lt d. vid e or de r d at ed 1 0 .09 .2 01 8 in I TA N o .98 3/ 20 18 .4 . Ld. DR f or the Re ven ue r el ie d up on t he as se ss me nt orde r an d th e f ir st ap pe ll at e ord er . 5. On p er us al of th e rec ord s, we o bs e rve tha t t he Ass e ssi ng Of f icer ha s mad e the i mpu gn ed ad di tio n o n t he gr ou nd t hat th e ass es se e ha s de po s ite d e mpl o ye e ’s c o ntr ib ut io n to ward s Pro vi den t Fu nd a nd E SI a mo un tin g to R s. 6 2,2 3, 65 7/ - af ter d ue da te a s pre sc ri be d u nd er th e re le va nt Ac t/ R ul es in br ea ch of Ex pla na ti on 5 to Se ct io n 4 3B o f the Ac t. T he A sse ss in g Of f icer a cco rd in gl y res or te d to t he ad d iti on s u nde r S ec tio n 36 (1 )( va) rea d w ith Se cti on 2(2 4) (x ) of th e Ac t. 6. It i s t he ca se of t h e as se ss ee bef or e l ow er a ut ho ri tie s t h at i t has dep os it ed t he e mp lo ye e ’s c on tr ib u tio n in E P F and ES I bef or e th e due dat e of f ilin g of retur n of inc o me st ip ula te d un der Sec ti on 13 9(1 ) of t he Ac t. 7. W e f in d t ha t th e i d ent ic al i ss ue ha s b een de ci ded in f a v our of the as se sse e b y t he Hon ’b le Del hi Hi g h Co ur t i n th e ca se of Pr. CI T vs. Pr o In te ra cti v e Se rv ice (I nd ia) Pvt . L td. vi de ord er dat ed 10. 09 .2 01 8 i n I TA No. 98 3/ 20 18 . T h e ex tr act of th e jud g ment is rep ro du ce d a s un de r: I.T.A. No.1379/DEL/2021 3 “ I n v i e w o f t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e D i v i s i o n B e n c h o f De l h i H i g h C o u r t i n C o m m i s s i o n e r o f I n c o m e - T a x v e r s u s A i m i l L im i t e d , ( 2 0 1 0 ) 3 2 1 I T R 5 0 8 ( D e l ) t h e i s s u e i s c o v e r e d a g a i n s t t h e R e v e n u e a n d , t h e r e f o r e , n o s u b s t a n t i a l q u e s t i o n o f l a w a r i s e s f or c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n t h i s a p p e a l . T h e l e g i s l a t i v e i n t e n t w a s / i s t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e am o u n t p a i d i s a l l o w e d a s a n e x p e n d i t u r e o n l y w h e n p a y m e n t i s a c t ua l l y m a d e . We d o n o t t h i n k t h a t t h e l e g i s l a t i v e i n t e n t a n d o b j e c ti v e i s t o t r e a t b e l a t e d p a y m e n t o f E m p l o y e e ' s P r o v i d e n t F u n d ( E P F ) a n d E m p l o y e e ' s S t a t e I n s u r a n c e S c h e m e (E S I ) a s d e e m e d in c o m e o f t h e e m p l o y e r u n d e r S e c t i o n 2 ( 2 4 ) ( x ) o f t h e A c t . ” 8. Re spe ctf u ll y f o ll o wi ng t he bi ndi n g pre ce den ts of H on’ bl e Del hi Hi gh Co urt , we d ir ect th e As se s sin g Of f ice r to al lo w th e cl ai m of the as ses se e a nd del et e th e a dd it io n. Hen ce , t he g ro un d s of ap pea l rai se d b y th e as se ss ee ar e a ll ow ed . 9. W h ile co nc lu di ng so, we al so tak e not e of t he p le a o f the ass es se e th at d el a ye d pa yme n t of e mp lo ye e ’s c on t ribut io n to PF /E SI C i s no t d is a llo wa bl e a s th e a m end me nt s to Sect io n 3 6( 1) (va ) and Se cti on 43 B ef f ected b y F in an c e Ac t, 2 02 1 we re app lic ab le pro sp ec ti vel y in rela ti on t o As ses s men t Ye ar 2 02 1-22 an d su bse qu en t ye ar s. The ref o re, th e c lai m of de du ct io n of con tr ib ut io n to E mp lo ye e ’s St a te In su ra nc e Sc he me ( ES I) a nd P ro vid en t F un d u/s .3 6( 1) (v a) c ou ld not be de ni ed to th e as se ss ee in As se s s ment Y ear 20 19- 20 i n qu est io n o n th e b as is of a me nd me nt s ma de b y Fi na nc e Act , 20 21 . F or th is pro po si ti on , we f in d su pp ort f ro m th e dec is io n of the C o- or di nat e Be nch of Tri bu na l in th e c as e of The Co nti ne nt al Re sta ur an t a nd Caf é C o mpa n y vs . I TO as r ep or te d i n ( 20 21) 91 IT R (Tr ib .) (S .N .) 6 0 ( B ang .) an d Ad ya r A nan da Bh av an Swe ets In dia P. Ltd . v s. AC IT , I TA No .4 02 a n d 40 3/ Ch n y/ 2 02 1 or der da te d I.T.A. No.1379/DEL/2021 4 08. 12 .2 02 1. C on se que nt l y, the a ct io n of re ve nue o n th is sco re i s s et asi de a nd ca nc el le d . 10. In th e res ul t, t he ap pea l of th e as se ss ee is a ll ow ed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 14/02/2022. Sd/- Sd/- [AMIT SHUKLA] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 14/02/2022 Prabhat