, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, CHENNAI . , . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 1381/MDS/2016 / ASSESSMENT YEAR :20 0 7 - 0 8 SIVAJI MOTORS, 19, BYE PASS ROAD, VELLORE 632 001. [PAN: A A BFS8216K ] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD I( 1 ), VELLORE . ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SUPRIYO PAL , J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 0 3 . 0 8 .201 6 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 10 . 0 8 .201 6 / O R D E R P ER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 13 , CHENNAI , DATED 1 5 . 0 2 .20 1 6 RELEVANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 0 7 - 0 8 . 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTI CE THROUGH RPAD [AD ON RECORD], NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. I.T.A . NO . 1381 /M/ 16 2 3. THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT R ULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE I S DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 10 TH AUGUST , 201 6 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 10 . 0 8 .201 6 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.