IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.1381/DEL./2017 ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-2007 SHRI GHAYOUR MOHAMMED KHAN, 1632, 2 ND FLOOR, KUCHA DAKHNI RAI, DARYA GANJ, NEW DELHI 110 002. PAN AGSPK8483F VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-30(1), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : -NONE- FOR REVENUE : SHRI T. VASANTHAN, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 08.08.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08.08.2017 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-16, NEW DELHI DATED 2 ND DECEMBER, 2016 FOR THE A.Y. 2006-2007. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTIFYING THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. IT APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREF ORE, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19 (2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING V ARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTI PLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COUR T DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR 2 ITA.NO.1381/DEL./2017 SHRI GHAYOUR MOHAMMED KHAN, NEW DELHI. LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILI NG OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEA L OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 08 TH AUGUST, 2017 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH 6. GUARD FILE // BY ORDER // ASST. REGISTRAR ITAT : DELHI BENCHES DELHI.