Shri. Madhukesh S Angadi, Hubli V. ITO, Hubli

ITA 1387/BANG/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0355 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-06-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 20-11-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

ITA.1387/BANG/2015 PAGE - 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH 'B', BANGALORE SHRI. ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.1387/BANG/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) SHRI. MADHUKESH S. ANGADI, NO.4, SHRI. BASAVANAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI 580 024 .. APPELLANT PAN : ADUPA0023C V. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(2), HUBBALLI .. RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI. S. R. KARUPPUSAMI, JCIT HEARD ON : 02.06.2016 PRONOUNCED ON : 10.06.2016 O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINS T AN ORDER DT 05.06.2015 OF THE CIT (A)-I, BANGALORE, FOR THE A. Y. 2009-10. 02. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBO DY APPEARED FOR ASSESSEE. IT IS SEEN FROM RECORDS THAT INSPITE OF THE DATE OF HEARING BEING ITA.1387/BANG/2015 PAGE - 2 MENTIONED IN THE NOTICE OF HEARING, WHICH HAS BEEN ISSUED AND SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE , NOBODY WAS PRESENT ON THE DATE OF HEARING. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, I AM OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS CASE. I DISMISS THE APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE IT AT IN CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND OF THE MADHYA P RADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480, AS THE APPEAL IS INFRUCTUOUS FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 03. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 10 TH JUNE, 2016. SD/- (ABRAHAM P GEORGE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER