Kannan Sumathi, Salem V. ITO, Salem

ITA 1389/CHNY/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5297 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-04-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 30-05-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VIJAYAPRABHA
• Assessee Lawyers: G BASKAR
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , D B ENCH, CHENNAI . , ! ' ! # . $ , % & BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1389/CHNY/2017 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) SMT. KANNAN SUMATHI, 92/1-A, YERCAUD ROAD, COLLECTOR BUNGALOW NORTH, HASTHAMPATTY, SALEM 636 007. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD I(4), 3, GANDHI ROAD, SALEM 636 007. PAN: AMQPS4265B ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) /ASSESSEE BY : SHRI G. BASKAR, ADVOCATE /REVENUE BY : SMT. VIJAYA PRABHA, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 18.04.2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18.04.2018 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), SALEM DATED 30.03.2017 IN C.NO.9544(06)/2016-17/PCI T/SLM FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 PASSED U/S.263 OF THE ACT. 2 ITA NO.1389 /CHNY /2017 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD.AR SUBMITTED A LETTER DATE D 18.04.2018 BEFORE US REQUESTING FOR WITHDRAWAL OF T HE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE EXTRACT OF THE LETTER DATED 1 8.04.2018 IS REPRODUCED HEREIN BELOW FOR REFERENCE: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL IN VIEW OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT DATED 08.12.2017 IN THE ASSESSEES CASE, GIVING EFFECT TO THE ORDER OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER U/S 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, D ATED 30.03.2017, WE HAVE INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE APPEAL. THEREFORE, WE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE ABOV E APPEAL. DATED AT CHENNAI ON THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2018. SD/- COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT 3. THE LD.DR DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION FOR WITHDR AWING THE APPEAL. 4. AFTER HEARING BOTH SIDES, CONSIDERING THE PRAYER OF THE LD.AR, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. 3 ITA NO.1389 /CHNY /2017 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 18 TH APRIL, 2018 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ! ' ! # . $ ) ( . ) ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) # $% /JUDICIAL MEMBER $% / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER &# /CHENNAI, '$ /DATED 18 TH APRIL, 2018 RSR $ )* +* /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. . ( )/CIT(A) 4. . /CIT 5. */0 1 /DR 6. 02 /GF