Sonaliben Hareshbhai Mehta, Surat V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2)(4), Surat

ITA 1393/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3983 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 8 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 24-05-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MRS ANUPAMA SINGLA
• Assessee Lawyers: PINAZ BHAGAT

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (VIRTUAL HEARING) . . ./ I.T.A NO.1393/AHD/2016 [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 SONALIBEN HARESHBHAI MEHTA, 8/1702, SETAN FALIYA, GOPIPURA, SURAT 395 001. [PAN: ABJPM 9175 A] VS . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(4), SURAT. / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT [ /ASSESSEE BY MS. PINAZ BHAGAT CA /REVENUE BY MRS . ANUPAMA SINGLA - SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING: 19 . 0 2 .20 2 1 /PRONOUNCEMENT ON: 1 9 . 0 2 .202 1 /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER: 1. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-4, SURAT DATED 23.03.2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2011-12. 2. THE APPEAL CAME UP HEARING ON 19 TH FEBRUARY 2021. THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE ALREADY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION DATED 03.02.2021 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL ON THE GROUND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SETTLED DISPUTE WITH THE DEPARTMENT UNDER VIVAD-SE-VISHWAS SCHEME2020 AND HAD ALREADY RECEIVED FORM-3, ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT-1, DATED 28.01.2021 COPY OF WHICH IS FILED. THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE STATED IN THE SAID APPLICATION THAT SONALIBEN HARESHBHAI MEHTA VS. ITO,,WARD-5(4), SURAT./ ITA NO.1393/AHD/2016 FOR A.Y. 2011-12 2 THE ASSESSEE SHALL PAY THE FULL AND FINAL DEMAND AS PER UNDERTAKING GIVEN BY ASSESSEE. THE LD. AR OF ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3. THE LD.DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE SR.DR APPEARING FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. RESULTANTLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 19 TH FEBRUARY 2021 AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL. SD/- SD/- (DR.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ( /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ( /JUDICIAL MEMBER) / SURAT, DATED : 19 TH FEB 2021 / #SGR COPY OF ORDER SENT TO- ASSESSEE/AO/PR. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/GUARD FILE OF ITAT. BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SURAT