IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B” DELHI BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A No.1397/DEL/2019 Assessment Year 2014-15 Capital Transformers P. Ltd., 56-B, Dilshad Garden, G.T. Road, Shahdara, Delhi. v. ACIT, Circle-5(2), New Delhi. TAN/PAN: AABCC7434J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri C.S. Anand, Adv. Respondent by: Shri N.K. Bansal, Sr.DR Date of hearing: 21 04 2023 Date of pronouncement: 21 04 2023 O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: The capt i oned appe al has been fi l ed b y t he Assessee agai nst the or der of the Co mmi ssioner of I nc o me Tax (A ppeal s)- XX XIII, New Del hi ( ‘C IT( A) ’ in shor t) date d 12. 09. 2018 arisi ng fro m the assessment or der dated 21. 12. 2016 passed by t he Assessi ng Of ficer (AO ) under Secti on 143( 3) of t he I nco me Tax Act , 1961 ( the Act) concerni ng A Y 201 4- 15. 2. The gr ounds of appeal raised b y the assessee read as under: “ 1 . T ha t o n t h e f a c t s o f th e ca se a n d u nd e r t h e l a w, t he do c u m e n t a r y e v i d e n c e s, w hi c h w e re i n p ub l i c d o m ai n a n d w h i c h we r e f ur ni sh e d by t h e a s s e ss e e b e f o r e t h e L d. C I T ( A) s i m p l y t o su p p o r t i t s c o nt e nt i o n ( w hi c h w a s m ad e b y t h e a s s e ss e e b e f o r e I.T.A No.1397/Del/2019 2 th e L d A s se s si ng O f f i c e r ) t ha t t he t a x wa s n ot r e qui re d t o b e de d u c t e d a t so u rc e o ut o f i nt e r e st pa i d/ p a y ab le t o R I I C O - a St at e G o ve r n m e n t C om p an y, o ug h t t o h a d be e n a d m it t ed . 2. T ha t on t h e f a ct s o f t h e c a s e a nd un de r t he l a w , I d. C I T ( A ) ha s e r re d i n no t co ns id e r i n g t he d o c u m e n ta r y e v id e nc e s, w h i c h we r e m a d e a v a i l ab l e t o hi m b y t he as s e s s e e du r i ng th e c o u r se o f ap p e l l at e p r oc e e di n g s t o de c i de t h e i s su e r el a t i n g t o ad d i t i on / d i sal l o w a n c e o f Rs . 1 1 , 90 , 68 8 / - m a de u / s . 4 0( a ) ( i a ). 3. T ha t o n t he f a c ts o f t h e c a s e a n d un d e r th e l a w, ad d i t i on / d i sal l o w a n c e o f R s. 1 1, 9 0, 6 8 8/ - m a d e u / s . 40 ( a) ( i a ) de se r v e s t o b e d e l et e d. ” 3. Br iefl y stat ed, t he assessee fi led ret urn of i nco me decl ari ng l oss of Rs. 4, 65, 60, 448/ -. T he case w as sel ect ed f or scruti n y assess me nt u nder Sect ion 14 3( 3) of t he A ct. In the cou rse of the as sess ment pr oceedi ngs, t he Assessing Offi ce r inquir ed on t he appl icabi li t y of TDS on i nt er est payme nt t o Rs.11,9 0, 688/ - made t o Raj ast han Est ate I ndustr ial Develo p ment and I nvest ment Cor porat i on ( RII CO). The Assessi ng Offi cer eve nt ual l y di sal lowed the i nterest i nvoki ng Se ct ion 40(a)(i a) of the Act on t he gr ound that TDS on i nterest has not been ded uct ed as appl ic abl e under Sect i on 194A of t he Act . 4. Aggri eved, the assessee pr ef err ed appeal bef ore the CIT( A) . Bef ore the CI T( A), the assessee f il ed cert ai n gover n me nt not if icat ions t o establi sh t hat the r ecipi ent co mpan y, i. e., RIICO i s e xe mpte d fr o m t he appl i cabil i t y of Secti on 1 94A an d t her ef or e, the as sessee cannot be tr eated i n def aul t under Sect i on 40(a) ( ia) of t he Act . The CIT( A) t reated such doc u ment a s addi ti onal e vidences and ref use d to ad mit such addi t ional evi de nces. Ha vin g done so, t he CI T(A) con fir med t he act i on of the Assessi ng Offi cer. I.T.A No.1397/Del/2019 3 5. Furt her aggri eved, the assessee pr ef err ed appe al bef or e the Tri bunal. 6. We have hea rd t he ri val submi ssions. The assessee conte nds t hat t he addi ti onal evi denc es placed bef ore t he CI T(A) ar e in t he natur e of gover n me nt not if icat ion a nd are in publ i c do mai n and t her efore st ri ct l y speaking there is no addi ti onal evi de nce i n it . T he not if icat i on go es to t he root of t he mat ter and are extre mel y relevant for t he purpose of det e mi anti on of tax l i abi li t y of t he assessee and ther ef ore, shoul d not have been di scar ded b y t he a ssessee on t echni cal gr ounds. 7. The l d. counsel sub mi t ted t hat on t he basis of noti fi ca ti on, the reci pient co mp an y RII CO does not fal l wit hi n the purvi ew of Secti on 194A of t he Act and t heref ore, Sect io n 40(a) (i a) is not at tr acted in the i nst ant case on meri ts. We fi nd mer it i n the plea of the assessee compan y f or a d mi ssi on of t he e vide nce sought t o be reli ed up on f or det er mi nat io n of correct ta xable i nco me. Rul e 46A of t he I ncome Ta x R ul es i s founde d upon pr inci ples of nat ur al just ice. I n the process of di schar gi ng the appel l at e functi on, it is i ncu mbent upon t he CIT (A) not t o arbit raril y refuse t o ma ke a n en quir y where ci rcu mstanc es so demand a nd to t heref or e ei the r ad mi t or call f or addi ti onal evi dence if so nee ded in ter ms of Sect i on 250( 4) of the Act . Thus, Secti on 250( 4) r .w. Rul e 46A gi ves ample power to the CI T( A) to ad mi t the addi t ional evi dence in t he ci rcums t anc es whi ch ar e avai labl e in t he pr esent ca se. It i s t he case of t he assessee t hat non consi derat i on of gover n me nt n oti fi cati on wil l cause seri ous prejudice t o t he assessee and suc h addit i onal e videnc e i s i n the I.T.A No.1397/Del/2019 4 nat ur e of go ver n ment noti fi cat ion w hich i n an y case i s avai labl e in t he publi c do ma i n. 8. Havi ng r ega rd t o the fact s and cir cu mst ances of the case, we are of t he vi ew t hat t he CI T( A) sh oul d have e xerci se i ts statut or y po wer to ad mi t t he ad dit ional evi dence i n favour of t he assessee bef it ti ng wi t h t he fact si tuat ion i n or der t o a dvance the cause of substanti al j usti ce. In t he prese nt case, ther e does not app ear to be an y i mpedi me nt e ven under R ul e 46A f or ad mi ssi on of such addit ional evi dence. The ref ore, the acti on of the CI T( A) is set aside and t he issue is r esto red bac k t o t he f i l e of the CIT( A) f or fres h adj udi cati on aft er t aki ng i nt o account such addit ional evi denc es as ma y be pl aced b y t he assessee t o support it s cont ent io n on t he i ssue t owar ds non deducti bi lit y of TDS on interest pa yment to RI IC O. We howe ver do not e xpress an y opi nion on me ri ts of the i ssue at thi s junct ure. It shal l be open to t he CIT(A) t o exa mi ne t he docu ment s and expl anati ons offere d concerni ng t he issue an d deci de t he issue afres h i n accor dance wit h l aw. 9. I n the result , the appeal of t he assessee i s al lowed f or stati sti cal purpose s. Order pronounced in the open Court on 21/04/2023. Sd/- Sd/- [CHANDRA MOHAN GARG] [PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: /04/2023 Prabhat