IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO.1409/DEL/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 PRIYANKA JHAWAR 191, MIG HOUSING BOARD COLONY, SECTOR 10, FARIDABAD PAN : AOSPM 2949 J VS. ITO, WARD-II(1), FARIDABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) A SSESSEE BY SHRI AJAY SINGHAL, C.A. RE VENUE BY SHRI GOVIND SINGHAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 17 /0 2 /202 1 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 17 /0 2 /202 1 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2017 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- FARIDABAD RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. BEFORE US, ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION DATED 07.02.2021 WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE HAS STATED THAT IT HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS (VSV) 2020 AND HAS FILED THE DECLARATION (FORM- ITA NO. 1409/DEL/2018 PRIYANKA JHAWAR VS. ITO A.Y. 2014-15 2 1) AND UNDERTAKING (FORM-2) SCHEME AND SEEKING FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. 3. AFTER CONSIDERING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. WITH THESE DIRECTIONS, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17.02.2021, IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING OF THE MATTER IN VIRTUAL MODE. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATE:- 17.02.2021 *PRITI YADAV, SR.PS* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI