IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR E-BENCH, NAGPUR (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE AT MUMBAI) . . , . / BEFORE SHRI R.K. GUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER / AND , . . SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO. 141/NAG/2011 M/S. SWAMI VIVEKANAND SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, DEULGAON RAJA, DIST: BULDHANA PAN: AAFTS 1058 R VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, NAGPUR. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : SHRI S.C. THAKAR RESPONDENT BY : S / SHRI H. WANARE & M. BHUSARI !'# / DATE OF HEARING : 21-12-2012 $%& !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21-12-2012 '( / O R D E R PER RAJENDRA, AM ASSESSEE TRUST FILED THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF APPEA L AGAINST THE ORDER DT.11-08-2011 PASSED U/S. 12AA OF THE INCOME TAX AC T, 1961 (ACT) BY THE CIT-I, NAGPUR. I. LEARNED CIT-I ERRED IN NOT GIVEN THE EFFECT OF 12A ORDER FROM 10-02-2009 II. LEARNED CIT-I HAS GIVEN THE EFFECT OF 12AA ORDER FR OM AY 2011-12 INSTEAD OF 10-02-2009. III. ASSESSEE CRAVES TO URGE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS AT THE T IME OF HEARING, IF NECESSARY. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE US, AUTHORISED REPRE SENTATIVE (AR) SUBMITTED THAT ASSESSEE WANTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. DEPARTMENT AL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAWAL OF THE SAID APPEAL. ITA NO. 141/NAG/2011 2 3. AS THE ASSESSEE-TRUST IS NOT INTERESTED IN PERUSING THE MA TTER, THEREFORE, WE ALLOW IT TO WITHDRAW THE SAME. APPEAL STANDS DISPOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES . ORDER PRONOUNCED BY E-BENCH AT MUMBAI ON THIS 21 ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2012. )* *,- . '( $%& 21 1' *,2012 % . SD/- SD/- ( . . / R.K. GUPTA ) ( / RAJENDRA ) '5 / JUDICIAL MEMBER # '5 / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER )* MUMBAI, 1' DATE: 21 ST DECEMBER, 2012 TNMM COPY TO: 1. APP EL LANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. THE CONCERNED CIT (A) 4. THE CONCERNED CIT 5. DR, ITAT, NAGPUR 6. GUARD FILE 6! ! //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER, ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT