IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA A BENCH, KOLKATA (BEFORE SRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, HONBLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SRI S.S. GODARA, HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA NO. 1438/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 EXPERIS IT PRIVATE LIMITED........................................................................................APPELLANT J3, BLOCK GP SECTOR V SALT LAKE KOLKATA 700 091 [PAN : AAACW 2286 K ] VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA...................RESPONDENT APPEARANCES BY: NONE, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. SHRI DHRUBAJYOTI RAY, JCIT D/R, APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE. DATE OF CONCLUDING THE HEARING : FEBRUARY 20 TH , 2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE ORDER : MAY 29 TH , 2020 ORDER PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM :- THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 2, KOLKATA, (HEREINAFTER THE LD.CIT(A)), PASSED U/S. 250 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT), DT. 05/04/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THERE IS NO PETITION FOR ADJOURNMENT EITHER. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE DISPOSE OFF THE CASE EX-PARTE ON MERITS QUA THE ASSESSEE AFTER HEARING THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE. 3. HEARD THE LD. D/R. ON PERUSING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. CIT(A), WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT APPEARED BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) AND HENCE AN EX-PARTE ORDER WAS PASSED DISMISSING THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. WE FIND THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS NOT DISPOSED OFF THE CASE ON MERITS. THIS IS NOT PERMISSIBLE IN LAW. HENCE, WE DEEM IT FIT TO RESTORE THE ISSUE TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A), FOR FRESH ADJUDICATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, AFTER GIVING THE ASSESSEE ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD, ON THE GROUNDS OF VIOLATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE. 4. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS NOTED THAT THE ORDER IS BEING PRONOUNCED AFTER NINETY (90) DAYS OF HEARING. HOWEVER, TAKING NOTE OF THE EXTRAORDINARY SITUATION IN THE LIGHT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND LOCKDOWN, THE PERIOD OF LOCKDOWN DAYS NEED TO BE EXCLUDED. FOR COMING TO SUCH A CONCLUSION, I RELY UPON THE DECISION OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH OF THE MUMBAI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. JSW LIMITED IN ITA NO. 6264/MUM/2018 & 6103/MUM/2018, ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14, ORDER DT. 14 TH MAY, 2020. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF KOLKATA, THE SD/- [S.S. GODARA] JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 29.05.2020 {SC SPS} COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. EXPERIS IT PRIVATE LIMITED J3, BLOCK GP SECTOR V SALT LAKE KOLKATA 700 091 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. 2 IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. KOLKATA, THE 29 TH DAY OF MAY, 2020. [ J. SUDHAKAR REDDY AC COUNTANT MEMBER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1), KOLKATA 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKATA BENCHES ITA NO. 1438/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 EXPERIS IT PRIVATE LIMITED ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SD/- J. SUDHAKAR REDDY ] COUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKATA BENCHES