Shri Nagindas T.Kapadia, Surat V. The ACIT.,Cent.Circle-4, Surat

ITA 1444/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 89491 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-06-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2015
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 20-05-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SONIA KUMAR
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, D IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ 1444 /AHD/2011 / ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-07 SHRI NAGINDAS T. KAPADIA, (PROP. SHIV KRUPA JARI) 3/1810, GHAMLAWAD, SHERI NO.1, GHAMLAWAD, SURAT. VS ASSTT. CIT, CEN.CIRCLE-4, SURAT. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SMT. SONIA KUMAR, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 01/06/2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 02/06/2015 $%/ O R D E R PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THIS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF TH E CIT(A)-II, AHMEDABAD DATED 30/03/3011 FOR ASSTT.YEAR 2006-07. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RE GISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE ON 23.4.2015 FIXING THE CASE FO R HEARING ON 01.06.2015. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NO NE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURS UING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (D ELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . ITA NO.1444/AHD/2011 AY 2006-07 2 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 2 ND JUNE, 2015 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (ANIL CHATURVEDI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 02/06/2015 $% & ''() *$)' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! / CONCERNED CIT 4. ! ( ) / THE CIT(A), AHMEDABAD 5. $%& '' , , )*++ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. &,- . / GUARD FILE. $% + / BY ORDER, ,/ - ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION- 01.06.2015 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER : 01.06.2015 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S. - 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT : 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK :4/6/15 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 7. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 8. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER