, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, AHMEDABAD , , BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.1458/AHD/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04) DY.CIT CIRCLE-3 AHMEDABAD / VS. M/S.SHYAM INDUSTRIES PLOT NO.402/403, PHASE-IV, GIDC NARODA, AHMEDABAD-382 330 # ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAFFS 4338 E ( #% / APPELLANT ) .. ( % / RESPONDENT ) #%' / APPELLANT BY : SHRI K. MADHUSUDAN, SR.DR %(' / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P.B. PARMAR, AR )*(+ / DATE OF HEARING 23/08/2017 ,-./(+ / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 04 /09/2017 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-6, AHME DABAD [CIT(A) IN SHORT] DATED 06/03/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2003-04. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE REVENUE RE AD AS UNDER:- ITA NO. 1458/AH D/2014 DCIT VS. M/S.SHYAM INDUSTRIES ASST.YEAR 2003-04 - 2 - THE CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACT IN ALLOWIN G DEDUCTION U/S.80HHC ON DEPB INCOME EVEN WHEN THE EXPORT TURNO VER EXCEEDED RS.10 CRORES AND THE CONDITIONS AS PER THE AMENDED PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80HHC(3) WERE NOT FULFILLED. ON THE FACT AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AN D IN LAW, THE CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFF ICER TO THE EXTENT MENTIONED ABOVE SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO DI SCLOSE HIS TRUE INCOME/BOOK PROFIT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LD.AR FOR THE ASSESSEE THAT APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS HIT BY CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10/12/2015. AS PER AFORESAID CIRCULA R, ALL PENDING APPEALS FILED BY REVENUE ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS A ME ASURE FOR REDUCING LITIGATION WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMIT WHICH IS RS.10 LAKHS. IN THE INSTANT CASE, T HE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ISSUE RAISED BY THE REVENUE IS STATED TO B E LESS RS.10 LAKHS AND THEREFORE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS REQUIRED TO BE D ISMISSED IN LIMINE . 4. THE LD.DR FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY ADMITTED THE AP PLICABILITY OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HOWEVER, IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE REVENUE TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL ON SHOWING INAPPL ICABILITY OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IN ANY MANNER. ITA NO. 1458/AH D/2014 DCIT VS. M/S.SHYAM INDUSTRIES ASST.YEAR 2003-04 - 3 - 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DIS MISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 04 / 09 /2017 SD/- SD/- () ( ) (RAJPAL YADAV) ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 04 / 09 /2017 3..),.)../ T.C. NAIR, SR. PS !'#$%$' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. #% / THE APPELLANT 2. % / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 456+ 7+ / CONCERNED CIT 4. 7+ ( ) / THE CIT(A)-6, AHMEDABAD 5. 89:+)56 , 56/ , 4 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. :<* / GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER, &8++ //TRUE COPY// / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION .. 28.8.17 (COVERED CASE TAX EFFECT BELOW 10 LACS) 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 29.8.17 3. OTHER MEMBER 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S.. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S.5.9.17 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 5.9.17 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER