IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH A AA A : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ,, , VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY MS. MADHUMITA ROY MS. MADHUMITA ROY MS. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO ITA NO ITA NO ITA NO . .. . 146 146 146 146 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 /DEL/20 1 11 1 9 99 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 : 20 : 20 : 20 1 11 1 4 44 4 - -- - 15 1515 15 SHRI ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA, SHRI ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA, SHRI ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA, SHRI ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA, 36 3636 36- -- -B, B, B, B, HANS VIHAR HANS VIHAR HANS VIHAR HANS VIHAR APARTMENTS, APARTMENTS, APARTMENTS, APARTMENTS, SECTOR SECTOR SECTOR SECTOR- -- -13, ROHINI, 13, ROHINI, 13, ROHINI, 13, ROHINI, DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI 110 085. 110 085. 110 085. 110 085. PAN : AHFPG1034J. PAN : AHFPG1034J. PAN : AHFPG1034J. PAN : AHFPG1034J. VS. VS. VS. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD WARD WARD WARD- -- -39(4), 39(4), 39(4), 39(4), NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI SATYAJEET GOEL, CA. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M. BARANWAL, SENIOR DR. DATE OF HEARING : 26 2626 26.11 .11.11 .11.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 2 22 26.11 6.11 6.11 6.11. .. .2020 2020 2020 2020 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP VPVP VP : :: : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-13, NE W DELHI DATED 7 TH DECEMBER, 2018. 2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, VIDE EMAIL DATED 24 TH NOVEMBER, 2020 HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSM ENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 20 20. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. ITA-146/DEL/2019 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED IN THE PRESENCE OF BOT H THE SIDES ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARING ON 26 TH NOVEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- ( (( ( MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY ) )) ) (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU ) )) ) JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VK. COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR