M/s. Pashupati Textiles & Prints Pvt. Ltd., Meerut V. DCIT, Meerut

ITA 1483/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7488 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-06-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2016
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 12-03-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHARVAN GOTRU

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO: 1483/DEL/2014 AY : - 2006-07 PASHUPATI TEXTILES & PRINTS PVT. LTD. VS. DC IT ALEEM MARKET, CIRCLE-2, KHANDAK BAZAR MEERUT MEERUT PAN AABCP0275C (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHR I SHARVAN GOTRU, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 6.4. 2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMEN T : 3.6.2016 O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AG AINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) MEERUT VIDE ORDER DATED 10.12.2013 PERTAINING TO ASSESSME NT YEAR 2006-07. 2. IN THIS CASE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSE F OR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR 6.4.2016 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VI DE COLMUN NO. 10. 3. ON 6.4.2016, NEITHER THE ASSESS NOR ITS AUT HORISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT . IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. ITA NO. 1483/DEL/2014 2 20X5 4. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PR OVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE A SSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYIN G FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED . 5. IN THE RESULT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN CO URT ON 3 RD JUNE, 2016 SD/- SD/- (H.S. SIDHU) (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT M EMBER DATED: THE 3 RD JUNE, 2016 VEENA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR BY ORDER AR REGISTRAR