IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, B ENGALURU BEFORE S HRI SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I TA NO. 1 498 / BANG/2 0 1 8 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 201 4 - 15 ) SHIVAKUMAR SWAMY MARISWAMAPPA RANGAPPA, NO.25, 3 RD FLOOR, KARNASREE POINT ANAND NAGAR, MARATHALLI POST, OUTER RING ROAD, BENGALURU - 560037. PAN: AVKPS 7926 C VS. APPELLANT INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(2)(3) , BENGALURU. RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : DR. G. MANOJ KUMA R, ADDL.CIT(DR) DATE OF HEARING : 04/06/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15 / 06/2018 O R D E R PER I NTURI RAMA RAO, AM : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX(APPEALS) - 4 , [CIT(A) ] , BENGA LURU , DATED 28 / 02 /201 8 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 4 - 15 . 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING, NOBODY APPEARED FOR ASSESSEE AND THERE WAS NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT ALSO . IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING ITS CASE. WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CW T (1997) 223 ITR 480, AS INFRUCTUOUS FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ITA NO . 1 498 /BANG/20 18 PAGE 2 OF 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH JUNE , 2018 S D/ - S D/ - ( SUNIL KUMAR YADAV ) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE : BENGALURU. D A T E D : 15 / 0 6 /201 8 SRINIVASULU, SPS COPY TO : 1 APPELLANT 2 RESPONDENT 3 CIT(A) 4 CIT 5 DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6 GUARD FILE BY ORDER SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE