, , IN THE INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI . , . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DUVVURU R L REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO S . 1505 AND 1506 /MDS/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR S :200 9 - 1 0 AND 2010 - 11 M/S. GILCHRIST INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD., GROUND FLOOR, 1 - 1 - 151/1, SAIRAM TOWERS, ALEXANDER ROAD, SECUNDERABAD. [PAN: A A B CG7321A ] VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , COMPANY CIRCLE II (2) , CHENNAI 600 034. ( / APPELLANT ) ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI A. B. K O LI, J CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 2 9 . 0 9 .201 5 / DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 29 . 0 9 .201 5 / O R D E R PER DUVVURU RL REDDY , JUDICIAL MEMBER : BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE SAME ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE CONSOLIDATED ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 6 , CHENNAI , DATED 13 . 0 2 .20 1 5 RELEVANT TO THE ASSE SSMENT YEAR S 200 9 - 1 0 AND 2010 - 11 . 2. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE [AD ON RECORD], NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEALS WERE TAKEN UP FOR HEARING OR ANY I.T.A. NO S . 1505 & 1506 /M/ 15 2 ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. HENCE, IT IS INFERRED THAT T HE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3 . THEREFORE, HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. (38 ITD 320) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), BOTH THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4 . IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THE 29 TH SEPTEMBER , 2015 AT CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - (A.MOHAN ALANKAMO NY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( DUVVURU RL REDDY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER CHENNAI, DATED, THE 29 . 0 9 .201 5 VM/ - / COPY TO: 1. / APPELLANT , 2. / RESPONDENT , 3. ( ) / CIT(A) , 4. / CIT , 5. / DR & 6. / GF.