MS. SUMITRA GOYAL, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-4, JAIPUR

ITA 1517/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0627 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-12-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 27-12-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARY CIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES SMC, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 1517/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 MS. SUMITRA GOYAL, B-71, BAJAJ NAGAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. I.T.O. WARD-6(4) JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABBPG 7580 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SAURABH HARSH (ADV) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 14/12/2020 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21/12/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), AJMER DATED 15/10/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: THE HUMBLE ASSESSEE APPELLANT RESPECTFULLY PRAYS THAT THE ASSESSEE APPELLANT HAS FILED AN INCOME-TAX APPEAL BEFORE ITA 1517/JP/2018_ SUMITRA GOYAL VS ITO 2 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR ON 27.12.2018. THAT ASSESSEE APPELLANT OPTED FOR THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 VIDE FORM 1 AND FORM 2 AND SAME WAS ACCEPTED AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED ON 04.11.2020 (COPY ENCLOSED) BY THIS APPLICATION WE REQUEST YOUR HONOURS TO FIXED AT THE EARLIEST AS ASSESSES DO NOT WISH TO PURSUE THE INSTANT INCOME TAX APPEAL PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE ITAT, JAIPUR BENCH AND PRAYS THE APPEAL TO BE PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. IT IS, THEREFORE, HUMBLY REQUESTED THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL BE DIRECTED TO BE LISTED AT THE EARLIEST AND OBLIGE THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY FOR SUMITRA GOYAL (N.K.BAID/SIDDHARTH RANKA/M. LQBAL/SAURAV HARSH) A/R 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ITA 1517/JP/2018_ SUMITRA GOYAL VS ITO 3 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 ST DECEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 21/12/2020 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- MS. SUMITRA GOYAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O. WARD-6(4), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 1517/JP/2018) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR