Bunts Welfare Trust, Udupi V. CIT, Mangalore

ITA 154/BANG/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0618 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-10-2009
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2009
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 27-02-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PREETHI GARG

Judgement Text

ITA NO.154/B/09 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPEL LATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH BANGALORE BENCH BANGALORE BENCH BANGALORE BENCH A AA A BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND AND AND AND SHRI SHRI SHRI SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A , A, A , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER CCOUNTANT MEMBER CCOUNTANT MEMBER CCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.154/BAN G/2009 (ASS ESSMENT YEAR ----) M/S BUNTS WELFARE TRUST, PADUBIDRI. . APPELLANT VS, THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MANGALORE. . RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. PREETHI GARG O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R PER PER PER PER GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE GEORGE K KK K, , , , JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER : : : : THIS APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED A GAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MANGAL ORE DATED 24.12.2008. 2. THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 28.07.09 AT THE REQUEST OF LEARNED AR VIDE HIS LETTER DATED 25.6.09. THE CASE WAS POSTED FOR HEARING ON 01.09.09 AT THE REQUEST OF SHRI RAMAKRIS HAN ALVA AR. LEARNED AR FURTHER REQUESTED FOR ADJOURNMENT VIDE L ETTER DT. 31.08.09 AND THE CASE WAS POSTED FOR HEARING ON 06.10.09 WI TH THE REMARK NO FURTHER ADJOURNMENT AND NO NOTICE TO BE ISSUED. H OWEVER, ON THE SAID DATE, NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ITA NO.154/B/09 2 3. FROM THE CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSEE, IT APPEARS THA T THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. CONSIDER ING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND IN THE LIGHT OF THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., (38 ITD 320, DEL BENCH) , WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS DISMISSED. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 6TH OCT, 2009. SD/ SD/ SD/ SD/- -- - SD/ SD/ SD/ SD/- -- - ( (( (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) ) ) ) ( ( ( (GEORGE GEORGE K) GEORGE GEORGE K) GEORGE GEORGE K) GEORGE GEORGE K) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER BANGALORE DATED : 06 /10/09 VMS. COPY TO : 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE REVENUE 3. THE CIT CONCERNED. 4. THE CIT(A) CONCERNED. 5. DR 6. GF 7. GF, ITAT, NEW DELHI. BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, BANGAL ORE.