, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH : CHENNAI ., ! '#$ . # % & ! ' BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G.PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.1567/MDS./2016 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 SMT.RITHA SABAPATHY, 1703,PHASE II, SATHUVACHARI,VELLORE-9. CHENNAI 600 094. VS. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, CHENNAI. [PAN ADEPR 8253 R ] ( () / APPELLANT) ( *+() /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : MR.A.V.SREEKANTH, JCIT D.R / DATE OF HEARING : 18 - 0 8 - 201 6 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18 - 0 8 - 2016 , / O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST A N ORDER DATED 29.02.2016 OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -13, CHENNAI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, NOBOD Y APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE ON 16.06.16. FROM THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD OF THE POST OFFICE ITA NO. 1567/MDS./2016 :- 2 -: PLACED ON RECORD, IT IS SEEN THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS RECEIVED THE NOTICE OF HEARING ON 17.06.2016. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS CASE. FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. ( 38 ITD 320 )(DEL.), WE DIS MISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON-PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AFTER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON 18 TH AUGUST, 2016 . SD/ - SD/ - ( ! . ' ) ( G.PAVAN KUMAR ) & ! / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( #$%&' ' !(! ) ( ABRAHAM P GEORGE ) ! / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER )* / CHENNAI +, / DATED: 18 TH AUGUST, 2016 K S SUNDARAM ,-$$ ./$0/ / COPY TO: $ 1 . / APPELLANT 4. $ 1 / CIT 2. / RESPONDENT 5. /23$ 4 / DR 3. $ 1$56 / CIT(A) 6. 37$8 / GF