ITA NO.1593/AHD/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD A BENCH, AHMEDABAD [CORAM: PRAMOD KUMAR AM AND MAHAVIR PRASAD JM] ITA NO.1593/AHD/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 (2), AHMEDABAD. ............ APPELLANT VS. GUJARAT STATE CO OP. BANK LIMITED, ....................... RESPONDENT SAHAKAR BHAVAN, RELIEF ROAD, AHMEDABAD. [PAN: AAAAT 9774 F] APPEARANCES BY S.K. DEV FOR THE APPELLANT T.P. HEMANI FOR THE RESPONDENT HEARING CONCLUDED ON: 27.09.2018 ORDER PRONOUNCED ON : 28.09.2018 O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR, AM: 1. BY WAY OF THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS CHALLENGED CORRECTNESS OF THE ORDER DATED 10 TH MARCH, 2015, PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIT(A)-10, AHME DABAD FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12, ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS: THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE ADDITION OF RS.42,20,048/- MADE ON ACCOUNT OF AMORTIZATION O F PREMIUM PAID ON GOVERNMENT SECURITIES WITHOUT APPRECIATING THE F ACT THAT THE BANK ITSELF HAS CATEGORISED THE GOVERNMENT SECURITY AS I NVESTMENT AND NOT SOCK IN TRADE OF BANK. ON THE FACT AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFF ICER TO THE EXTENT MENTIONED ABOVE SINCE THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO DI SCLOSE HIS TRUE INCOME/BOOK PROFIT. THE APPELLANT PRAYS THAT THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) ON THE ABOVE GROUNDS BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFI CER BE RESTORED TO THE ABOVE EXTENT. ITA NO.1593/AHD/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 PAGE 2 OF 2 2. AT THE OUTSET, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE NEEDS TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3 OF 2018 DATED 11.07.2018. THE L EARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE FIND THAT PRIMA-FACIE THIS APPEAL OF TH E REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF THE RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3/2018 IN F.NO.279/M ISC.142/2007-ITJ (PT) DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018, VIDE WHICH IT HAS BEEN DECIDED BY THE B OARD THAT NO DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS SHOULD BE FILED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IF THE TAX EFFE CT BY VIRTUE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)S ORDER IS BELOW RS. 20 LACS. THE BOARD HAS PROVIDED EXEMPTIONS AT CLAUSE (10) OF THE INSTRUCTIONS WHERE IN IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE, WHERE THE CONS TITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF AN ACT/RULE IS UNDER CHALLENGE OR WHERE BOARDS ORD ER, NOTIFICATION, INSTRUCTION OR CIRCULAR HAS BEEN HELD TO BE ILLEGAL OR WHERE REVEN UE AUDIT OBJECTION IN THE CASE HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OR WHERE THE ADDITI ON RELATES TO UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN ASSETS/BANK ACCOUNTS ETC. WE FIND THAT THE PRESENT CASE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXEMPTION CLAUSE AND THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS .20 LACS. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND HENCE DISMISSED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT TODAY ON THE 28 TH SEPTEMBER, 2018. SD/- SD/- MAHAVIR PRASAD PRAMOD KUMAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEM BER) DATED: 28 TH SEPTEMBER, 2018 PBN/* COPIES TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) DR (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCHES, AHMEDABAD