VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR JH ,-MH- TSU U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 160/JP/2014 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 DINESH KUMAR LADDA, PROP.- M/S LADDA JEWELLERS, CHURI BAZAR, BUNDI. CUKE VS. I.T.O., BUNDI. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ L A-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ABPPL 5675 G VIHYKFKHZ @ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ @ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : NONE (DATE WAS NOTED) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 07/09/2016 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07/09/2016 VKNS'K @ ORDER PER: A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), KOTA DATED 29/11/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT Y EAR 2010-11. 2. IN SPITE OF NOTING THE DATE OF NEXT HEARING I.E. 07/09/2016, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN IT WAS CALLE D FOR HEARING. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTE D TO PURSUE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI B ENCH OF ITAT IN THE ITA NO. 160/JP/2014 DINESH KUMAR LADDA VS. ITO 2 CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., AND ALSO ESTAT E OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP), THE APPEAL OF THE A SSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMISSED AS LIMINE AS PRONOUNCED I N THE OPEN COURT ON 07/09/2016. SD/- , - MH TSU (A.D. JAIN) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ @ JAIPUR FNUKAD @ DATED:- 07 TH SEPTEMBER, 2016 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI DINESH KUMAR LADDA, BUNDI. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, BUNDI. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 160/JP/2014) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR