Income-tax Officer, V. Smt. Madhuri Balkrishna Sathe, Pune

ITA 1600/PUN/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2734 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-02-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2016
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 19-08-2014
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: HEMANTKUMAR C LEUVA
• Keywords: Tax effect
• Section: 143(3); 12A; 148

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH A , PUNE , , BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA , A M . / ITA NO. 1598 /PN/201 4 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 08 - 09 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 7 (2), PUNE . / APPELLANT VS. SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE, B - 303, ARYA BUILDING, AMRUTKALASH SOCIETY, SHAHU COLONY, LANE NO - 9, KAR VE NAGAR, PUNE 52 . / RESPONDENT PAN: AA JPV7662E . / CO NO. 06 /PN/201 6 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 08 - 09 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE, B - 303, ARYA BUILDING, B - 303, ARYA BUILDING, AMRUTKALASH SOCIETY, SHAHU COLONY, LANE NO - 9, KARVE NAGAR , PUNE 52 / CROSS OBJECT OR PAN: AA JPV7662E VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7 (2), PUNE . / RESPONDENT . / ITA NO. 1 600 /PN/201 4 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 08 - 09 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD 7 (2), PUNE . / APPELLANT VS. SMT. MADHURI BALKRISHNA SATHE, 111 & 112, RAMYA NAGRI HSG SOCIETY, NEAR SUHAG MANGALK ARYALAYA, BIBWEWADI, PUNE 30 . / RESPONDENT PAN: A ONPS9826H ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 2 . / CO NO. 0 8 /PN/20 1 6 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 08 - 09 SMT. MADHURI BALKRISHNA SATHE, 111 & 112, RAMYA NAGRI HSG SOCIETY, NEAR SUHAG MANGALKARYALAYA, BIBWEWADI, PUNE 30 / CROSS OBJECT OR PAN: A ONPS9826H VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7 (2), PUNE . / RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI HEMANT KUMAR C. LEUVA / DATE OF HEARING : 27 . 0 1 .201 6 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 05 . 0 2 .201 6 / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWL A, J M : BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE ARE AGAINST SEPARATE ORDERS OF CIT(A) - III, PUNE, BOTH DATED 10.06.2014 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008 - 09 AGAINST RESPECTIVE ORDERS PASSED UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT , 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) . THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO FILED THEIR RESPECTIVE CROSS OBJECTIONS AGAINST THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE. 2. THE REVENUE IN ITA NO.1598/PN/2014 HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF APPEAL: - 1. THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) IS CO NTRARY TO LAW AND TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 2. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) - III HAS ERRED IN NOT APPRECIATING THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EXIT OPT ION SCHEME OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIA WERE DIFFERENT FROM THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EXIT OPTION SCHEME FRAMED BY STATE BANK OF INDIA. ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 3 3. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) - I II HAS ERRED IN PLACING RELIANCE ON CBD T 'S CIRCULAR F.NO.200/34/2009 - ITA - 1 DATED 06.10.2009 WHICH IS WITH REGARD TO RBL'S EXIT OPTION SCHEME AND NOT THAT OF STATE BANK OF INDIA. 4. ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LEA RNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) - III HAS ERRED IN NOT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION CBDI'S CIRCULAR WHICH EXPLICITLY STATES THAT SBL'S EXIT OPTION SCHEME IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR EXEMPTION U/S 10(1 0 C) OF THE ACT. 5. FOR THIS AND SUCH OTHER REASONS A S MAY BE URGED AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE ORDER OF THE ID. CIT(A) MAY BE VACATED AND THAT OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER BE RESTORED. 6. THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE TO ADD, AMEND, ALTER OR DELETE ANY OF THE ABOVE GROUNDS OF APPEAL DURING THE COURSE OF APPEL LATE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL. 3. THE ASSESSEE IN CO NO. 06/PN/2016 HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF OBJECTIONS: - RETURN OF INCOME FOR AY 2008 - 09 WAS FILED ON 29TH JULY 2008 SHOWING T OTAL INCOME RS.5,96,780/ - VIDE ACK N O .0721010085 AND REFUND OF RS.1,90,270/ - WAS CLAIMED. THE ASSESSING OFFICER ISSUED A NOTICE U/S 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 WHEREBY THE CASE WAS REOPENED FOR SCRUTINY. AFTER SUBMITTING VARIOUS SUBMISSIONS, THE A O PASSED AN ORDER U/S 143 (3) R.W.S. 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 ON 1 7 TH NOVEMBER 2011 DISALLOWING AN AMOUNT OF RS.5, 00,00, / - WHICH WAS CLAIMED UNDER SECTION 10(10)C THEREBY MAKING A TAX DEMAND WITH WHICH WAS CLAIMED UNDER SECTION 10(10)C THEREBY MAKING A TAX DEMAND WITH REGARD TO SAME. AGGRIEVED BY SUCH ORDER I PREFERRED AN APPEAL WITH CIT (APPEALS) ON 11TH JANUARY 2012 VIDE APPEAL NO.PN/CITA - III/WD - 7(2)/413/2011 - 12/141. HONORABLE CIT(A) DECIDED THE SAID CASE IN MY FAVOUR AND ORDERED THE A O TO DELETE THE ADDITION MADE BY DISALLOWING C LAIM OF SECTION 10(10)C VIDE ORDER DATED 10 TH JUNE 2014 . I RECEIVED A NOTICE OF HEARING FROM HONORABLE ITAT, PUNE ON 13/01/2016. IT MADE ME AWARE THAT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT HAS FILED AN APPEAL WITH HONORABLE ITAT, PUNE AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY HONOR ABLE CIT(APPEALS). WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO MY RIGHT TO DEFEND MY CASE ON MERIT, AT THIS POINT OF TIME I WANT TO RELY ON CIRCULAR NO 21/2015, F279/MISC 142/2007 - ITJ(PT) DATED 10TH DECEMBER 2015, THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL MADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO ITAT IS APPEALABLE ONLY ONCE THE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS RS. 10,00,000 / - . WHEREIN THE TAX EFFECT IN MY CASE EVEN AFTER ADDING THE DEBATED AMOUNT OF RS.5, 00,000 / - MAKING MY TOTAL INCOME RS.I0,96,780/ - AND APPLYING THE MAXIMUM RATE OF TAX (30%) AMOUNTS TO RS.3,29,034/ - WHICH DOESN'T EXCEED RS. 10,00,000 / - . SO IN THE VIEW OF THIS, APPEAL MADE BY THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT IS NOT SUSTAINABLE. I REQUEST TO ALLOW ANY ALTERATION, ADDITION, MODIFICATION OR DELETION OF ANY OR ALL GROUNDS OF APPEAL. ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 4 4. IN BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE , THE ISSUE INVOLVE D IS LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE CBDT S CIRCULAR NO.21/2015 ISSUED ON 10.12.2015 . T HE CROSS OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEES AGAINST BOTH THE APPEALS ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE ORDER OF CIT(A). 5. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPLICATION WAS MOVED FOR ADJOURNMENT AND SINCE THE ISSUE INVOLVED IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS LOW TAX EFFECT, WE PROCEED TO DECIDE THE ISSUE AFTER HEARING THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE. 6. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE FAIRLY POINTED OUT THAT BOTH THESE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE ARE NOT MAINTAINABLE BECAUSE OF LOW TAX EFFECT. 7. ON PERUSAL OF THE RECORD AND AS POINTED OUT BY THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE, THE TAX EFFECT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS BELOW RS.10 REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE, THE TAX EFFECT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS BELOW RS.10 LAKHS AND IN VIEW OF CBDTS CIRCULAR NO .21/2015 ISSUED ON 10.12.2015, WHERE IT HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED THAT SUBJECT TO CERTAIN INSTRUCTIONS, WHICH ARE NOT RELEVANT TO THE PRESENT CASE, NO DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL WOULD BE FILED AGAINST THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, UNLESS THE TAX EF FECT EXCLUDING INTEREST EXCEEDS RS.10 LAKHS. IT IS FURTHER PROVIDED VIDE THE SAID CIRCULAR ITSELF THAT THE SAID LIMIT WOULD BE APPLICABLE NOT ONLY TO ALL FUTURE TAX LITIGATIONS BUT EVEN TO THE PENDING APPEALS WHERE THE TAX INVOLVED IN THE APPEALS DOES NO T EXCEED RS.10 LAKHS AND THE SAME SHALL NOT BE PRESSED OR WITHDRAWN. 8 . THE ISSUE ARISING IN THE PRESENT APPEAL S IS IN RELATION TO THE ADDITION, WHEREIN THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. IN THIS BACKGROUND, WE HAVE TO CONSIDER THE CIRCULAR NO.21/2 015 DATED 10.12.2015 OF CBDT. THE CBDT VIDE THE SAID CIRCULAR HAS ANNOUNCED THAT SUBJECT TO CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, NO DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL WOULD BE FILED ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 5 AGAINST THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, WHERE THE TAX EFFECT EXCLUDING INTEREST DOES NOT EXCEED RS.10 LAKHS. THE SAID INSTRUCTIONS ARE MADE APPLICABLE NOT ONLY TO THE FUTURE APPEALS TO BE FILED BY THE REVENUE BUT EVEN TO THE PENDING APPEALS WHERE THE TAX INVOLVED IN EACH OF THE APPEAL DOES NOT EXCEED RS.10 LAKHS, THE SAME ARE INSTRUCTED N OT TO BE PRESSED OR TO BE WITHDRAWN BY THE REVENUE. IN VIEW THEREOF, WHERE AN APPEAL IS PENDING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE YEAR TO WHICH IT RELATES, THE SAID INSTRUCTIONS OF THE CBDT WOULD BE APPLICABLE AND THE APPEALS OF THE REVENUE PENDING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS WOULD BECOME NULLITY. THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE CIRCULAR IS AS UNDER: - 3. HENCEFORTH, APPEALS/SLPS SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMITS G IVEN UNDER: - S NO APPEALS IN INCOME - TAX MATTERS MONETARY LIMIT (IN RS.) 1 BEFORE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 10,00,000/ - 2 BEFORE HIGH COURT 20,00,000/ - 3 BEFORE SUPREME COURT 25,00,000/ - IT IS CLARIFIED THAT AN APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED MERELY BECAUSE THE T AX EFFECT IN A CASE EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMITS PRESCRIBED ABOVE. FILING OF APPEAL IN SUCH CASES IS TO BE DECIDED ON MERITS OF THE CASE. 4. FOR THIS PURPOSE, TAX EFFECT MEANS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TAX ON THE TOTAL 4. FOR THIS PURPOSE, TAX EFFECT MEANS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TAX ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED AND THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUES AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS INTENDED TO BE FILED (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS DISPUTED ISSUES). HOWEVER, THE TAX WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY INTEREST THER EON, EXCEPT WHERE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST ITSELF IS IN DISPUTE. IN CASE THE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST IS THE ISSUE UNDER DISPUTE, THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST SHALL BE THE TAX EFFECT. IN CASES WHERE RETURNED LOSS IS REDUCED OR ASSESSED AS INCOME, THE TAX EFF ECT WOULD INCLUDE NOTIONAL TAX ON DISPUTED ADDITIONS. IN CASE OF PENALTY ORDERS, THE TAX EFFECT WILL MEAN QUANTUM OF PENALTY DELETED OR REDUCED IN THE ORDER TO BE APPEALED AGAINST. 5. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL CALCULATE THE TAX EFFECT SEPARATELY FOR EV ERY ASSESSMENT YEAR IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUES IN THE CASE OF EVERY ASSESSMENT. IF, IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSEE, THE DISPUTED ISSUES ARISE IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, APPEAL, CAN BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH TH E TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUES EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3. NO APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF AN ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3. IN OTHER WORDS, HENCEFORTH, APPEALS CAN BE FILED ONLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TAX EFFECT IN THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR. HOWEVER, IN CASE OF A COMPOSITE ORDER OF ANY HIGH COURT OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY, WHICH INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR AND COMMON ISSUES IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF ALL SUCH ASSESSMENT YEARS EVEN IF THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMITS IN ANY OF THE YEAR(S), IF IT IS DECIDED TO FILE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE YEAR(S) IN WHICH TAX EFF ECT EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT PRESCRIBED. IN CASE WHERE A COMPOSITE ORDER / JUDGMENT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSEE, EACH ASSESSEE SHALL BE DEALT WITH SEPARATELY. ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 6 9 . THE CBDT HAS FURTHER CLARIFIED THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTED ISSUE ARISES IN MORE THAN O NE ASSESSMENT YEAR, THEN THE APPEAL CAN BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF THE DISPUTED ISSUE EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN PARA 3 I.E. RS.10 LAKHS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. IT IS FURTHER DIRECT ED THAT HENCEFORTH, THE APPEALS CAN BE FILED BY THE REVENUE ONLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TAX EFFECT IN THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR. HOWEVER, IN CASE OF A COMPOSITE ORDER OF ANY HIGH COURT OR APPELLATE AUTHORITY, WHICH INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR AND COMMON ISSUES IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, THEN APPEAL SHALL BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR, EVEN IF THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE PRESCRIBED MONETARY LIMITS IN ANY OF THE YEAR(S), IF IT IS DECIDED TO FILE APPEAL IN RESPECT OF THE YEAR(S) IN WHICH TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT PRESCRIBED. WHERE A COMPOSITE ORDER / JUDGMENT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE ASSESSEE, THEN EACH ASSESSEE SHALL BE DEALT WITH SEPARATELY. IT IS ALSO PROVIDED FURTHER VIDE PARA 6 THAT WHERE THE APPEAL BEFO RE THE TRIBUNAL WAS NOT FILED ONLY ON ACCOUNT OF TAX EFFECT BEING LESS THAN SPECIFIED MONETARY LIMIT, THEN THE INCOME - TAX DEPARTMENT SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM FILING AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DISPUTED ISSUES IN THE CASE OF THE SAME ASSESSEE FOR ANY OTHER ASS ESSMENT YEAR, OR IN CASE OF ANY OTHER ASSESSEE FOR THE SAME OR ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT YEAR, IF THE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS THE SPECIFIED MONETARY LIMITS. THE CBDT HAS FURTHER VIDE PARA 8 SPECIFIED THE ISSUE WHICH SHOULD BE CONTESTED ON MERITS NOTWITHSTANDING THA T THE TAX EFFECT ENTAILED IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMITS SPECIFIED. FURTHER, THE SPECIFIED MONETARY LIMITS AS PER PARA 9 WOULD NOT APPLY TO WRIT MATTERS AND DIRECT TAX MATTERS OTHER THAN INCOME TAX AND ALSO IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE APPEALS WHERE TAX EFF ECT IS NOT QUANTIFIABLE OR NOT INVOLVED, SUCH AS THE CASE OF REGISTRATION OF TRUSTS OR INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE ACT. IN SUCH CASES, THE DECISION TO FILE AN APPEAL IS TO BE TAKEN ON THE MERITS OF A PARTICULARS CASE. THE PARAS 6 TO 9 OF THE CI RCULAR READ AS UNDER: - 6. IN A CASE WHERE APPEAL BEFORE A TRIBUNAL OR A COURT IS NOT FILED ONLY ON ACCOUNT OF THE TAX EFFECT BEING LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED ABOVE, THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX SHALL SPECIFICALLY RECORD THAT EVEN THOUGH THE DECISION IS ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 7 NOT ACCEPTABLE, APPEAL IS NOT BEING FILED ONLY ON THE CONSIDERATION THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT SPECIFIED IN THIS INSTRUCTION. IN SUCH CASES, THERE WILL BE NO PRESUMPTION THAT THE INCOME - TAX DEPARTMENT HAS ACQUIESCED IN THE DECISION ON THE DISPUTED ISSUES. THE INCOME - TAX DEPARTMENT SHALL NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM FILING AN APPEAL AGAINST THE DISPUTED ISSUES IN THE CASE OF THE SAME ASSESSEE FOR ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT YEAR, OR IN THE CASE OF ANY OTHER ASSESSEE FOR THE SAME OR ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT YEAR, IF THE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS THE SPECIFIED MONETARY LIMITS. 7. IN THE PAST, A NUMBER OF INSTANCES HAVE COME TO THE NOTICE OF THE BOARD, WHEREBY AN ASSESSEE HAS CLAIMED RELIEF FROM THE TRIBUNAL OR THE COURT ONLY ON THE GROUND THAT THE DEPARTMENT HAS IMPLICITLY ACCEPTED THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL OR COURT IN THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE FOR ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT YEAR OR IN THE CASE OF ANY OTHER ASSESSEE FOR THE SAME OR ANY OTHER ASSESSMENT YEAR, BY NOT FILING AN APPEAL ON THE SAME DISPU TED ISSUES. THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES/COUNSELS MUST MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO BRING TO THE NOTICE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR THE COURT THAT THE APPEAL IN SUCH CASES WAS NOT FILED OR NOT ADMITTED ONLY FOR THE REASON OF THE TAX EFFECT BEING LESS THAN THE SPECIFIE D MONETARY LIMIT AND, THEREFORE, NO INFERENCE SHOULD BE DRAWN THAT THE DECISIONS RENDERED THEREIN WERE ACCEPTABLE TO THE DEPARTMENT. ACCORDINGLY, THEY SHOULD IMPRESS UPON THE TRIBUNAL OR THE COURT THAT SUCH CASES DO NOT HAVE ANY PRECEDENT VALUE. AS THE E VIDENCE OF NOT FILING APPEAL DUE TO THIS INSTRUCTION MAY HAVE TO BE PRODUCED IN COURTS, THE JUDICIAL FOLDERS IN THE OFFICE OF CSIT MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A SYSTEMIC MANNER FOR EASY RETRIEVAL. 8. ADVERSE JUDGMENTS RELATING TO THE FOLLOWING ISSUES SHOULD BE CONTESTED ON MERITS NOTWITHSTANDING THAT THE TAX EFFECT ENTAILED IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMITS SPECIFIED IN PARA 3 ABOVE OR THERE IS NO TAX EFFECT: ( A ) WHERE THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE PROVISIONS OF AN ACT OR RULE ARE UNDER CHALLENGE, OR ( B ) WHERE BOARDS ORDER, NOTIFICATION, INSTRUCTION OR CIRCULAR HAS BEEN HELD TO BE ILLEGAL OR ULTRA VIRES, OR ( C ) WHERE REVENUE AUDIT OBJECT IN THE CASE HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR OR ( D ) WHERE THE ADDITI ON RELATES TO UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN ASSETS / BANK ACCOUNTS. 9. THE MONETARY LIMITS SPECIFIED IN PARA 3 ABOVE SHALL NOT APPLY TO WRIT MATTERS AND DIRECT TAX MATTERS OTHER THAN INCOME TAX. FILING OF APPEALS IN OTHER DIRECT TAX MATTERS SHALL CONTINUE TO BE GO VERNED BY RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF STATUTE & RULES. FURTHER, FILING OF APPEAL IN CASES OF INCOME TAX, WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS NOT QUANTIFIABLE OR NOT INVOLVED, SUCH AS THE CASE OF REGISTRATION OF TRUSTS OR INSTITUTIONS UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE IT ACT, 1961, SHALL NOT BE GOVERNED BY THE LIMITS SPECIFIED IN PARA 3 ABOVE AND DECISION TO FILE APPEAL IN SUCH CASES MAY BE TAKEN ON MERITS OF A PARTICULAR CASE. 10 . THE RETROSPECTIVE OPERATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONS TO PENDING APPEALS IS PROVIDED IN PARA 10 OF THE CI RCULAR, WHICH READS AS UNDER: - 10. THIS INSTRUCTION WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN HIGH COURTS / TRIBUNALS. PENDING APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED TAX LIMITS IN PARA 3 ABOVE MAY BE WITHDRAWN / NOT PRESSED . APPEALS BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THIS SUBJECT, OPERATIVE AT THE TIME WHEN SUCH APPEAL WAS FILED. 11 . IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE SAID INSTRUCTIONS OF CBDT IN THE APPEAL S WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS, T HE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE, WHICH ARE PENDING ITA NO. 1598 /PN/20 1 4 SMT. MEGHANA MUKUND VAZE & ORS . 8 BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ARE NOT TO BE PRESSED OR WITHDRAWN BY THE REVENUE. SINCE THE TAX EFFECT IN THE PRESENT APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE IS ADMITTEDLY LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS, THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE INSTR UCTIONS OF CBDT AND THE ENTIRETY OF FACTS, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE REVENUE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 12. THE CROSS OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE ORDER OF CIT(A) AND HENCE, ARE ALSO DISMISSED. 1 3 . IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE AP PEAL S OF THE REVENUE AND THE CROSS OBJECTIONS OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 5 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY , 201 6 . SD/ - SD/ - (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE ; DATED : 5 TH FEBRUARY , 201 6 . GCVSR GCVSR / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPEL LANT ; 2. / THE RESPONDENT; 3. ( ) / THE CIT (A) - III , PUNE ; 4. / THE CIT - I V, PUNE ; 5. , , / DR A , ITAT, PUNE; 6. / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER , // TRUE COPY // / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE