SRI RAMANA HEAVY ENGINEERING PVT LTD, CHENNAI V. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE-6(4), CHENNAI

ITA 1613/CHNY/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3049 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-05-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 22-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’बी’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी वी दुगाŊ राव Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी जी. मंजुनाथा, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1613/Chny/2019 िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year:2010-11 M/s. Sri Ramana Heavy Engineering P. Ltd., AP-769, 10 th Sector, 59 th Street, KK Nagar, Chennai 600 078. [PAN:AAJCS3174P] Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle 6(4), Chennai. (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri M. Karunakaran, Advocate ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 06.04.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 05.05.2022 आदेश /O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO,, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 16, Chennai, dated 19.02.2019 relevant to the assessment year 2010-11 challenging the appellate order of confirming the levy of penalty under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income for the assessment year 2010-11 on 27.09.2010 and self- assessment tax amounting to Rs.6,03,972/- was not paid. Therefore, I.T.A. No.1613/Chny/19 2 the Assessing Officer passed penalty order under section 221(1) of the Act dated 10.02.2011 levying penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- for failure to pay the self-assessment tax under section 140A(3) of the Act. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the penalty levied under section 221(1) of the Act. 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. While reiterating the submissions as made before the ld. CIT(A), the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee could not remit the tax on the date of filing of return of income solely due to insufficient liquid funds. It was further submission that despite incurring huge cash loss in the subsequent years, the assessee remitted the self-assessment tax amount of Rs.6,03,972/- on 04.03.2011 and prayed for deleting the penalty levied under section 221(1) of the Act. 4. On the other hand, the ld. DR relied on the orders of authorities below. 5. We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. In this I.T.A. No.1613/Chny/19 3 case, the self-assessment tax under section 140A(3) of the Act was not paid before filing the return of income by the assessee. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has levied penalty under section 221(1) of the Act. It is not in dispute that the assessee has not at all paid the self- assessment tax, but it was paid within six months i.e., on 04.03.2011 and also produced challan before the ld. CIT(A). Since the assessee has paid the self-assessment tax within six months of filing of return of income and also produced the challan before the ld. CIT(A), we are of the considered opinion that the penalty levied under section 221(1) of the Act is liable to be deleted. Accordingly, the penalty levied under section 221(1) of the Act is deleted. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on the 05 th May, 2022 in Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (G. MANJUNATHA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (V. DURGA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 05.05.2022 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयुƅ (अपील)/CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 6. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.