1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH D , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 6754 /DEL/201 3 AY: 20 0 2 - 03 WORLDCAST TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE 18(1) (NOW KNOWN AS SHAADIONLINE P.LTD.) NEW DELHI 16, SANT NAGAR, 2 ND FLOOR EAST OF KAILASH NEW DELHI 110 065 PAN: AAACW 3050 F (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SH.ASHIS MOHANTY, SR.D.R. ORDER PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 29.10.2013 OF LD.CIT(A) - IX, NEW DELHI FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 0 2 - 03 . 2. ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 26.11.2015 , NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED DESPITE ISSUAL OF NOTICE BY RPAD. HENCE IT IS PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. HE ARD SHRI ASHIS MOHANTY, LD.SR.D.R. ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE. 3. FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA P.LTD. 38 ITD, 320 (DELHI), AND THE DECISION OF THE HON BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHEMIPOL VS. UOI AND OTHERS IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62/2009 JUDGEMENT DT. 17 TH SEPTEMBER,2009, WE CONSIDER IT A FIT CASE FOR DISMISSING THE APPEALS IN LIMINE, AS NOT ADMITTED. IT IS TO CLARIFY THAT 2 SUBSEQUENTLY, IF THE ASSESSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON - APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 30 TH NOVEMBER ,2015. SD/ - SD/ - (C.M.GARG) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: THE 30 TH NOVEMBER , 2015 *MANGA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT; 2.RESPONDENT; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR; 6.GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR