Income Tax Officer Ward-1 , Bagalkot V. M/s Hungund Taluka Teachers Co-op Credit Society Limited , Bagalkot

ITA 1624/BANG/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4840 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-04-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 08-09-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: B R RAMESH
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH A BEFORE S HRI N.V. VASUDEVAN , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JASON P BOAZ , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T . A. NO. 1624 /BANG/20 16 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 12 - 13 ) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, BAGALKOT. . APPELLANT. VS. M/S. HUNGUND TALUKA TEACHERS CO - OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., WARD NO10, MAHANTESH ROAD, HUNGUND, DIST. BAGALKOT. .. RESPONDENT. APPELLANT BY : SHRI B.R. RAMESH, JCIT (D.R) R E SPONDENT BY : NONE. DATE OF H EARING : 23.4.2018. DATE OF P RONOUNCEMENT : 25 .04 .201 8 . O R D E R PER SHRI JASON P BOAZ, A .M . : THIS APPEAL BY REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMI SSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) , BELGAUM, DT.8.7.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 12 - 13. SINCE NONE WAS PRESENT FOR THE ASSESSEE WH EN THE CASE WAS CALLED, WE PROCEED TO DISPOSE OFF THE APPEAL WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR REVENUE AND THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. 2 IT A NO. 1624 /BANG/201 6 2. BRIEFLY STATED, THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS UNDER : 2.1 THE ASSESSEE, A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED IN PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS, FILED THE RETURN OF INCOME FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13 ON 15.9.2012 DECLARING INCOME AT NIL AFTER CLAIMING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SH ORT 'THE ACT') AMOUNTING TO RS.46,34,333. THE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE ACT VIDE ORDER DT.18.10.2014; WHEREIN THE ASSESSING OFFICER REJECTED THE ASSESSEE'S CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT, HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND THEREFORE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION CLAIMED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF SEC. 80P(4) OF THE ACT. ON APPEAL, THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS), BELGAUM, VIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT.8.7.2016 ALLOWED THE AS APPEAL AND U PHELD THE ASSESSEE'S CLAIM FOR BEING ENTITLED TO CLAIM DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT BY PLACING RELIANCE ON THE DECISIONS OF THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF (I) CIT VS. SHRI BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA SAHAKARI SANGH NIY AMITHA (ITA NO.5006/2013 DT.5.2.2014) AND (II) CIT VS. BANGALORE COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. (ITA NO.351/2011 DT.27.6.2014). 3.1 REVENUE, BEING AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE CIT (APPEALS), BELGAUM DT.8.7.2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 2 - 13, HAS FILED THIS APPEAL, WHEREIN IT HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS : 3 IT A NO. 1624 /BANG/201 6 3.2 THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE WAS HEARD IN SUPPORT OF THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED (SUPRA) A N D STRONG RELIANCE WAS PLACED ON THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER IN THE MATTER. 3.3.1 WE HAVE HEARD THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, PERUSED AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THERE IS NO DISPUTE WITH RESPECT TO THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY PROVIDING CRE DIT FACILITIES ONLY TO ITS MEMBERS , REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 AND DOES NOT POSSESS ANY LICENSE FROM RBI TO CARRY ON BANKING BUSINESS. IT IS NOT ANY BODY S CASE THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS PROVIDING BANKING O R CREDIT FACIL ITIES TO NON - MEMBERS. THESE FACTS HAVE BE EN EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE TRU E BY THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS) AT PARA 9 OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEFORE HE WENT ON 4 IT A NO. 1624 /BANG/201 6 TO HOLD TH A T THE ASSESSEE'S CASE IS SQUARELY COVERED BY THE DECISIONS OF THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH CO URT IN THE CASES OF SHRI BILURU GURUBSAVA PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA (SUPRA) AND BANGALORE COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. (SUPRA). THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, IN THE AFORESAID DECISIONS (SUPRA) ON SIMILAR FACTS AND IDEN TICAL ISSUE, HAVE HELD THAT A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND NOT REGISTERED WITH THE RBI AS A CO - OPERATIVE BANK WITH LICENSE FOR BANKING ACTIVITIES, CANNOT BE DENIED DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT. 3.3.2 RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE AFORESAID DECISIONS IN THE CASES OF THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF SHRI BILURU GURUBSAVA PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA (SUPR A) AND BANGALORE COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. (SUPRA), WE FIND NO REASON TO DEVIATE FROM OR INTERFERE WITH THE FINDING RENDERED BY THE LEARNED CIT (APPEALS) IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER. CONSEQUENTLY, GROUNDS RAISED BY REVENUE ARE DISMIS SED. 4. IN THE RESULT, REVENUE S APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13 IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 201 8 . SD/ - (N.V. VASUDEVAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/ - (JASON P BOAZ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER *REDDY GP 5 IT A NO. 1624 /BANG/201 6 COPY TO : 1 APPELLANT 4 CIT(A) 2 RESPONDENT 5 DR. ITAT, BANGALORE 3 CIT 6 GUARD FILE SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE.