] ]] ] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE , ! ' , $ % BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI ANIL CHATURV EDI, AM ITA NO.1631/PN/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, SOLAPUR. . APPELLANT VS. SHRI SHANKAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED, SADASHIVNAGAR, TAL. MALSHIRAS, DIST. SOLAPUR. PAN : AAAAS3735M . RESPONDENT / APPELLANT BY : SHRI P. L. KUREEL / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI PRASANNA JOSHI / DATE OF HEARING : 29.09.2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 29.09.2016 & / ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM : THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III, PUNE DATED 19.06.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. THE REVENUE HAS RAISED THE FOLLOWING EFFECTIVE G ROUND OF APPEAL :- 01] WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LEARNED CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION M ADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER ON ACCOUNT OF SALE OF SUGAR AT CONCESSIONAL RATE AT RS .15,08,719/- TO ITS MEMBERS AND NON MEMBERS. 2 ITA NO.1631/PN/2014 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. AR SUBMITTED THAT THE APP EAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT AND, THER EFORE, BE DISMISSED. HE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), ASS ESSEE HAS ALSO NOT PREFERRED ANY APPEAL. THE LD. DR FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EF FECT ON THE IMPUGNED ADDITIONS IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE CBDT CIRCULAR OF 10/12/2015 BEARING NO. 21 OF 2015 AND THEREFORE THE APPEAL BE DECIDED ACCORDINGL Y. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE M ATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. ON PERUSING THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED B Y THE REVENUE, WE FIND THAT REVENUE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A) IN RESPECT OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY HIM. AS PER THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT) DATED 10/12/2015 (CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015), NO DEPARTMENT APPEALS ARE TO BE FILED AGAINST RELIEF GIVEN BY LD. CIT(A) BEFORE THE INCOME TAX AP PELLATE TRIBUNAL UNLESS THE TAX EFFECT, EXCLUDING INTEREST, EXCEEDS RS.10 LAKHS AND IT FURTHER STATES THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO THE PEND ING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRESENT CASE, SINCE IT IS AN UNDISPUTED FACT THAT ON THE AD DITIONS WHICH ARE IN DISPUTE, THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS AND IN THE ABSE NCE OF ANY MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD BY THE REVENUE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ISSUE IN THE PRESENT APPEAL IS COVERED BY EXEMPTIONS SPECIFIED IN CLAUSE (8) OF TH E AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE MONETARY LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE INSTRUCTIONS OF THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THEREFORE THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF REVENUE WITHOUT EXPRESSING ANY OPINION ON MERITS OF THE CASE. HOWE VER, IN CASE THERE IS ANY ERROR IN THE COMPUTATION OF THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED OR IF FOR ANY REASON, THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR IS NOT APPLICABLE, IT WOULD BE OPEN T O THE REVENUE TO SEEK REVIVAL OF THE APPEAL. 3 ITA NO.1631/PN/2014 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 29 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. SD/- SD/- ( SUSHMA CHOWLA ) ( ANIL CHATURVEDI ) / JUDICIAL MEMBER $ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PUNE ; DATED : 29 TH SEPTEMBER, 2016. & ' (!)* +*! / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1) THE ASSESSEE; 2) THE DEPARTMENT; 3) THE CIT(A)-III, PUNE; 4) THE CIT-IV, PUNE; 5) THE DR B BENCH, I.T.A.T., PUNE; 6) GUARD FILE. & / BY ORDER , ' # //TRUE COPY// $ %& # '( / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY ) '* , / ITAT, PUNE