Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2019] 118 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3379 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
7 month(s) 17 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
26-02-2019
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Allowed
Bench Allotted
SMC
Assessment Year
2014-2015
Appeal Filed On
09-07-2018
Judgement Text
, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO. 1641/AHD/2018 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15) THE CHAROTAR CO- OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. VADA BAZAR, UMRETH, DIST. ANAND 388220 / VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3, ANAND ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAAAC2068D ( APPELLANT ) .. ( / RESPONDENT ) / APPELLANT BY : SHRI DIVYAKANT K. PARIKH, A.R. / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI O. P. SHARMA, CIT.D.R. DATE OF HEARING 18/02/2019 !'# / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 26/02/2019 / O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-4, VADODAR A (CIT(A) IN SHORT), DATED 24.04.2018 ARISING IN THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 14.12.2016 PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER (AO) UND ER S. 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (THE ACT) CONCERNING AY 2 014-15. 2. THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE REA D AS UNDER: 1. THE LD CIT(APPEALS) HAS ERRED BOTH IN LAW AND O N FACTS IN PARTLY CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE LD.AO IN RESPECT ADDITI ON OF INTEREST ITA NO. 1641/AHD/18 [THE CHAROTAR CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. VS. ITO] A.Y. 2014-15 - 2 - INCOME OF RS. 37,85,129/- COMPUTED BY AO. WHICH IS WRONGLY CALCULATED AT PARA 5.2 OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER BEIN G CUMULATIVE FIGURE FOR EARLIER YEARS. THE GROSS INTEREST OF RS. 39,16,962/- AS PER PROFIT& LOSS ACCOUNT PERTAINING TO YEAR UNDER CONSI DERATION BEING INCLUSIVE OF INTEREST FROM MEMBERS, BANK FD INTERES T AND ALSO INTEREST FROM COOPERATIVE BANK, ADDITION MADE AT RS . 37,85,129/- BE HELD TO BE UNTENABLE AND DELETED. 2. THE LD CTT(A) FAILED TO APPRECIATE THAT INTERES T FROM MEMBERS OF THE APPELLANT SOCIETY AND INTEREST FROM BANKS INCLU DING COOPERATIVE BANK PERTAINING TO THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION IS EXEMPT U/S 80P(2) (A) (I) AND U/S 80P (2)(D) WHICH OUGHT TO HA VE BEEN DELETED. IT BE SO HELD NOW. 3. THE LD CIT(A) ALSO ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION OF INTEREST FROM BANKS AND SARDAR SAROVAR U/S 80P WHICH IS EARNED FROM EMPLOYMENT OF OPERATIONAL FUNDS OF A PPELLANT. IT BE ALLOWED NOW. 4. THE LD C1T(A) ALSO ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION OF INTEREST INCOME FROM COOPERATIVE BANK WHICH IS OTHERWISE ALSO EXEMPT AND DEDUCTIBLE U/S 80P(2)(D). THE SAME BE DELETED NOW. 5. THE LD CIT(A) ALSO ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN NOT APPRECIATING THAT AS THE TOTAL EXPENSES AS PER PROFIT & LOSS ACC OUNT AMOUNTED TO RS.37,62,711/- AND NET SURPLUS BEING ONLY RS.2,80,4 67/-, SUCH TOTAL EXPENSES OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN ALLOWED IN PROPORTION T O THE COMPOSITION OF VARIOUS INTEREST INCOME INCLUDED IN GROSS INTEREST INCOME OF RS.39,16,962/-. IT BE DIRECTED TO BE SO ALLOWED NOW. 4. WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, THE LEAR NED AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE LIMITED GRIEVANCE OF TH E ASSESSEE IS TOWARDS RECKONING OF INTEREST INCOME FOR THE PURPOS ES OF DEDUCTION UNDER S.80P OF THE ACT. IN THIS REGARD, THE LEARNE D AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT IT HAS REPORTED AGGREGATE INTEREST I NCOME OF RS.39,16,962/- BOTH FROM LENDING TO MEMBERS AS WELL AS PLACING DEPOSIT WITH NATIONALIZED BANKS. THE LEARNED AR FO R THE ASSESSEE REFERRED TO THE DECISION IN ITS OWN CASE IN ITA NO. 387/AHD/2016 ORDER DATED 17/04/2018 TO SUBMIT THAT IN THE IDENTI CAL SITUATION THE CO- ORDINATE BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITS OWN CASE HAS SENT BACK THE MATTER TO THE FILE OF THE AO FOR SUITABLE VERIFICATION AND RE-ADJUDICATION. THE LEARNED AR ACCORDINGLY SOUGHT IDENTICAL RELIEF CONC ERNING AY 2014-15 IN QUESTION IN PARITY WITH THE EARLIER ORDER OF THE ITAT. ITA NO. 1641/AHD/18 [THE CHAROTAR CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. VS. ITO] A.Y. 2014-15 - 3 - 5. THE LEARNED DR, ON THE OTHER HAND, SUBMITTED THA T THE ASSESSEE SHOULD PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF INTEREST EARNED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES BEFORE THE ITAT TO ENABLE IT TO GIVE OBJECTIVE DIRE CTIONS TO THE AO IN THIS REGARD. 6. WE HAVE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIO NS. THE LIMITED QUESTION BEFORE US IS WHETHER INTEREST EARNED BY TH E ASSESSEE SOCIETY WOULD QUALIFY FOR GRANT OF DEDUCTION UNDER S.80P(2) (A)(I) OF THE ACT. THE ASSESSEE, IN THE INSTANT CASE, IS A CO-OPERATIV E SOCIETY FOR THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IN QUESTION. THE AO DENIE D THE BENEFIT OF SECTION 80P OF THE ACT TO THE ASSESSEE ON BOTH COUN TS (I) INTEREST INCOME DERIVED FROM ITS OPERATIONS CONNECTED TO MEM BERS AS WELL AS FROM (II) DEPOSITS PLACED WITH NATIONALIZED BANKS. IT IS WELL SETTLED THAT SUCH CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES WOULD BE ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION UNDER S.80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT TOWARDS INTEREST INCOME F ROM PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS IN CONSONANCE OF THE JUDG MENT OF THE HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN CITIZEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. VS. ACIT (2001) 88 TAXMANN.COM 279 (SC). HOWEVER, INTEREST EARNED FROM FIXED DEPOSITS WITH NATIONALIZED BANKS (OTHER THAN CO-OPE RATIVE SOCIETY) WILL NOT QUALIFY FOR GRANT OF DEDUCTION UNDER S.80P OF T HE ACT. WE FIND THAT THE IDENTICAL ISSUE WAS SET ASIDE TO THE FILE OF THE AO BY THE TRIBUNAL IN AY 2012-13 IN ASSESSEES OWN CASE WITH DIRECTION TO THE AO TO APPLY THE AFORESAID PROPOSITION AS LAID DOWN IN THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS. THE RELEVANT OPERATIVE PARA OF THE ORD ER OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 387/AHD/2016 IS REPRODUCED HEREUNDER: 5. WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE LD.REPRESENTATIVES, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE RECORD CAREFULLY. THE LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESS EE DID NOT DISPUTE WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSITION THAT AFTER DECISION OF TH E HON'BLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. C IT, 389 ITR 578, INTEREST INCOME BY THE ASSESSEE FROM FIXED DEPOSITS WITH NATIONALIZED BANKS WILL NOT QUALIFY FOR GRANT OF DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT. HE CONTENDED THAT IN THIS TOTAL COMPONENT OF RS.40,40,724/-, THE AO HAS INCLUDED DIFFERENT ITEMS OUT OF THAT CERTAIN AMOUNTS RELATE TO EARLIER YEARS OF ASSESSMENT. THEREFORE, HE PRAYED T HAT THIS ISSUE BE SET ITA NO. 1641/AHD/18 [THE CHAROTAR CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD. VS. ITO] A.Y. 2014-15 - 4 - ASIDE TO THE FILE OF THE AO FOR VERIFICATION AND RE -ADJUDICATION. THE LD.DR HAS NO OBJECTION ON THIS PROPOSITION OF THE LD.COUS NEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. 6. ON DUE CONSIDERATION OF THE ABOVE FACTS, WE SET ASIDE THE ORDERS OF THE REVENUE AUTHORITIES. THE LD.AO SHALL RE-EXAMINE THE ISSUE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF INTEREST INCOME FROM ELIGIBLE AMOUNT F OR THE PURPOSE OF DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I). THIS EXERCISE BE CARRIED OUT IN THE LIGHT OF HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA (SUPRA). THE LD.AO SHALL WORK OUT NET INTERES T INCOME FOR THE CURRENT YEAR FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXCLUSION FROM ELIGIBLE AMO UNT FOR GRANT OF DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE ACT. WI TH THE ABOVE DIRECTION, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTIC AL PURPOSE. 6. IN PARITY, THE ISSUE IS SET ASIDE WITH IDENTICAL DIRECTION TO THE FILE OF THE AO. 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALL OWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMA R KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 26/02/2019 TRUE COPY S. K. SINHA !'#' / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- &. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE (. )*+ , / CONCERNED CIT 4. ,- / CIT (A) /. 012 33*+4 *+#4 56) / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 7. 289 : / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / 4 /5 *+#4 56) THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 26/02/20 19
